Update: Negation of the Grandfather Paradox

  • Thread starter Thread starter jacirez
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paradox
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the grandfather paradox in time travel, proposing that one cannot alter their past because the act of contemplating such a change indicates that the change has not occurred. The original post argues that if time travel were possible, one would already possess memories of the altered timeline, thus negating the paradox. However, a response highlights that this topic is speculative, lacking conclusive experimental support, and suggests it belongs in a philosophy forum rather than a physics discussion. An article from Popular Mechanics reinforces that while quantum mechanics offers insights, it does not resolve the grandfather paradox, affirming that time travel remains a speculative subject. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the philosophical nature of time travel discussions and the absence of empirical evidence.
jacirez
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I originally posted the following:
"...
I believe I found a solution (or a negation) to one of temporal mechanics most enduring paradox:
If you travel back in time, could you kill your own grandfather, thereby altering your future, even erasing yourself from existence?

The short answer is NO. You can't.

This is simply because the moment (present instant) you formulate the thought to travel back in time to do anything to alter your fate as you remember in that instant (past and present), the mere act of formulating the thought means that on fact you DID NOT travel back in time and altered your fate as you remember it in the first place.

This is because if you did in fact travel back in time and altered your fate (past and present), you would (in the present instant you formulate the thought) already have the memory that you did in fact travel back in time and altered your fate.

Since you do not have these memories (as you formulate the thought of traveling back in time in the first place), simply asking the question, rather than remembering past actions (remembering that you already traveled back in time and altered your future) , negates the paradox...
..."

I received this response:
"...
This is too speculative. As far as I know, there has not been a conclusive physics experiment that has tested this issue. Therefore, all answers are purely hypothetical and philosophical. Hence, this discussion is better suited on some philosophy forum instead of PF.

Thread locked.

Do read this (section 4, 5 and 6): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_travel#Time_travel_to_the_past_in_physics
Any question about this can be asked in our forum. Personal theories such as the OP cannot be allowed as such..."

Today, the following article appeared on Popular Mechanic:
http://www.popsci.com/article/science/quantum-mechanics-saves-grandfathers-time-travelers
Quantum Mechanics Saves Grandfathers From Time Travelers

Probability solves a great question of time travel. Well, probably.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Unfortunately this does not solve the issue of the grandfather paradox. Time travel is not possible, and as such, any discussion on it is necessarily steeped in speculation and philosophy. Thread closed.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
I don't need cloth simulation. I need to simulate clothing meshes. Made of triangles and I need an answer that someone with High School math can understand. I am actually using the time it takes for someone to answer to create a model with less geometry than the one I have been using. I want clothing that can be removed on a model that will be animated. I don't need stretching or wrinkles on my meshes, I just need gravity. I have an idea of how I could do it, but I don't know how to apply...
Back
Top