Updates on String Theory: Progress and Current Status

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tom McCurdy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hello
Tom McCurdy
Messages
1,017
Reaction score
1
Hello Again---What did I Miss

I haven't had very much free time lately and regret to say that my reading in the realm of physics has been very lacking lately. Anyway I was hoping to find out progress has been made in regards to String Theory. I have gotten the feeling (could be compeltly wrong) that string theory is having a very rough time lately and that it's starting to not be thought of as a very likely theory. If I could get some updates and maybe some papers or articles (something shorter) to read to get some updates, I would appreciate it.

_Tom
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Basically the last thing I had read was Brian Greene's The Elegant Universe, when i was preparing for my lecture on the subject for the student exchange. If anyone could give me any updates on how the quest for proof of string theory is going, i would really enjoy reading about it.
 
Tom McCurdy said:
Basically the last thing I had read was Brian Greene's The Elegant Universe, when i was preparing for my lecture on the subject for the student exchange. If anyone could give me any updates on how the quest for proof of string theory is going, i would really enjoy reading about it.


Umm, that's a problem. The last thing that has happened with string theory is the Landscape Probllem, which has led to a lot of long time critices of string theory coming out of the closet. A Coulumbia University mathematician named Peter Woit established a http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/" to express his view, and significantly it's called Not Even Wrong.

The string theorists themselves, those that aren't just keeping at their work, are tied up in this Landscape business. It was shown a couple of years ago that it seems extremely likely that just about any string theory version will predict a huge number (like 10500) equivalent vacua with disfferent parameters and apparently we live in only one of them (although some people are exploring the idea that we live in a superposition), with string thory having no known decision rule for picking that one out. So some physicists are touting the strong Anthropic Principle for doing the selection, but that sounds mystical to the critics and to many string physicists too.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
33
Views
7K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
5K
Back
Top