Upper-level Books for Theoretical Physics: Lie Group & Functional Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter _DJ_british_?
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Books
AI Thread Summary
A Physics student is seeking recommendations for two types of books: one on Lie groups and their applications in physics, suitable for someone without formal group theory training, and another on functional analysis with a focus on Fourier Analysis and Probability. A suggested resource for Lie algebras is "Introduction to Lie Algebras" by Erdmann and Wildon, which is noted for its accessibility, requiring only a solid understanding of linear algebra. The book reviews essential linear algebra concepts and is considered suitable for those with a background in rigorous mathematics. However, there is uncertainty about undergraduate-level resources specifically addressing Lie groups in physics. A link to a potentially helpful book on the subject was shared, which has received positive reviews.
_DJ_british_?
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I'm a Physics student and I'm planning to go to grad school in theoretical physics (I'm still in my first year so things may change but oh well) My question is twofold:

1. Any good book on Lie group and its application to physics, for someone with no formal course in group theory (Something that could build group theory up to Lie theory would be perfect!)?

2. A book on functional analysis, with application to Fourier Analysis and Probability (preferably).

My background is : Complex Analysis at the level of Stein, Measure Theory at the level of Halmos, Differential geometry at the level of Docarmo and Manifold Theory at the level of Boothby.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You might want to try "Introduction to Lie Algebras" by Erdmann and Wildon.

I have the book and I've begun going through it, and it seems pretty good so far. I can't yet say definitively whether is a good book or not, but as far as I know, its the only Lie Algebra book that I know of.

According to the author, all you should need to understand the book and get something out of it is a good understanding of Linear Algebra at the level of Friedberg, Axler, etc; he does review all relevant L.A. in the book though. From what I've gone through so far, I do think some exposure to rigorous math is needed, which you clearly have. I do have previous experience with group theory though, and group theory is very different from subjects like Analysis, Diff Geo, etc.

But I really think, the only necessary prereq is that you have some experience learning and doing rigorous math.

As far as a book that covers Lie Groups and Physics at the UG level, I am not quite sure what to recommend. So I got curious and found this: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521884004/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Its gotten a couple of good reviews. Maybe I'll pick it up myself.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
10K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top