Upward acceleration of submerged bubble based on radius

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the upward acceleration of a submerged spherical bubble, the initial upward force can be derived from Archimedes' principle, which states that the buoyant force equals the weight of the water displaced by the bubble. The formula for this force is F = (4/3) π r³ d g, where r is the bubble radius, d is the density of the liquid, and g is the acceleration due to gravity. The downward force is the weight of the air in the bubble, calculated similarly using the density of the gas. The initial acceleration can be determined using F = ma, where F is the resultant force and m is the mass of the gas bubble. However, it is important to note that the bubble will quickly reach terminal velocity, and factors like viscosity and surface tension may also influence its motion.
pjackson
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all!
Im a computer program that needs to simulate the motion of some bubbles. Id like to get a physically correct formula for my bubbles upward acceleration.

I have a perfectly spherical bubble of air of known radius. It is submerged in water. Discounting any friction or surface tensiony down force, what is the formula for its upward acceleration?

What is my starting point for working this out? All I've been able to find are a bunch of gas laws which I can't see how they relate.. Would it be possible to point me in the right direction for this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I feel a bit silly that I can click on the word bubbles in my post and be taken to a page that gives me a formula that is nearly there-

https://www.physicsforums.com/mgc_gloss/latex_images/mgc_gloss_equation_319-0.png

However, this is giving me a velocity. I am assuming this is a terminal velocity acheived when the drag of the water levels out with the up force. It would be good to have the underlying acceleration.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As a simplified analysis you could consider the initial upward force on the bubble is just the Archimedes upthrust and is equal to the weight of the volume of water displaced by the bubble.
F= (4/3) π r³ d g
where r is bubble radius and d is density of liquid. g=9.8 m/s/s
Against that you have the very small downwards force of the weight of the air in the bubble.
Same formula but use density of gas.
The initial acceleration is given by F=ma
F is resultant force and m is mass of gas bubble. [=(4/3) π r³ d]
However, the bubble quickly reaches a terminal velocity.
It also changes shape; and there's other factors in there such as viscosity and surface tension.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top