Upward velocity of a block on a string

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the upward velocity of a block suspended from a spring after being pulled down and released. The spring has a force constant of 600 N/m and is initially stretched to 0.86m before being released. The conservation of energy principle is applied, with initial and final kinetic and potential energy equations set up. There is a debate about whether gravitational potential energy should be considered negative, depending on the reference point chosen. The final upward velocity calculated is 1.92 m/s, but adjustments for gravitational potential energy are necessary for accuracy.
ethex
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The force constant of a spring is 600 N/m and the un-stretched length is 0.72m. A 3.2kg block is suspended from the spring. An external force slowly pulls the block down, until the spring has been stretched to a length of 0.86m. The external force is then removed, and the block rises. In this situation, when the spring has the contracted to a length of 0.72m, What is the upward velocity of the block?

Homework Equations


conservation of energy

The Attempt at a Solution



KEinitial + Uinitial = KEfinal + Ufinal
0 + 0.5(600)(0.14)^2 = 0.5 x 3.2 x v^2 + 0
v = 1.92m/s?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't forget that gravity is working on the block too!
 
KEinitial + Uinitial = KEfinal + Ufinal
0 + 0.5(600)(0.14)^2 + (3.2)(9.8)(0.14) = 0.5 x 3.2 x v^2 + 0

Is this right?
 
ethex said:
KEinitial + Uinitial = KEfinal + Ufinal
0 + 0.5(600)(0.14)^2 + (3.2)(9.8)(0.14) = 0.5 x 3.2 x v^2 + 0

Is this right?

Better, but should the gravitational PE be negative? (It looks like you're taking the zero reference for it at the unstretched spring level).
 
Thank you, that is what i am missing out.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top