Use node voltage method to solve i2 vbe and vce

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a circuit problem using the node voltage method. Participants are reviewing a worked-out solution, identifying potential errors, and suggesting alternative approaches to the analysis. The focus is on the application of circuit analysis techniques, specifically node voltage analysis, and the handling of resistors in parallel and series configurations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests feedback on their solution using the node voltage method and invites others to identify any errors.
  • Another participant suggests combining parallel resistors to simplify the problem, proposing a specific equivalent resistance value.
  • A different participant emphasizes the importance of following the node voltage analysis method and expresses intent to revise their solution based on class notes.
  • Concerns are raised about the clarity of the original solution, with a suggestion to include more diagrams and explanations.
  • Participants discuss the calculations for equivalent resistance, with differing values presented for the same resistor combinations, leading to confusion about the correct approach.
  • One participant argues that combining resistors is acceptable in the context of the problem, while another insists on adhering strictly to the node voltage method without combining resistors.
  • Further calculations are presented, with one participant detailing the steps to find voltages and currents using their approach.
  • Another participant asserts that their method is quicker and more efficient, having tested it with simulation software.
  • A participant acknowledges algebraic errors in their previous work but maintains that their method is valid.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the validity of combining resistors in the context of node voltage analysis, leading to unresolved disagreements about the best approach to the problem. There is no consensus on the correct equivalent resistance values or the overall methodology.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific resistor values and configurations, but there are inconsistencies in the calculations presented. The discussion highlights the complexity of applying node voltage analysis and the potential for multiple valid approaches to the problem.

Ninja_IPGO
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have attached the problem and the worked out solution can a few people go over it and post if it's right and if not what is wrong with it.

Using node voltage method
 

Attachments

  • problem5.png
    problem5.png
    4.3 KB · Views: 502
  • Scan2.jpg
    Scan2.jpg
    17 KB · Views: 528
  • Scan1.jpg
    Scan1.jpg
    27.1 KB · Views: 530
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey man i am not sure where you went wrong in your work but it isn't correct. I would first combine all those resistors that are in parallel to get an Req of 5000/17 ohms. Then the problem is really easy to set up. Then to split them back you will need to use current or voltage division to find the proper current through or voltage drop of the resistors. (Parallel resistors have the same voltage across them), hope that helps.
 
the problem is he wants me to solve it using node voltage analysis I am going through some class notes now and i'll post a new version later on tonight I ll see what i can do with the information you gave me thank you
 
I get 263 ohms for the parallel combination.

You can work out the voltages and currents with just a calculator and then at least you will know if what you are getting makes sense when you do the node analysis.

I would add a LOT more explanation and diagrams. I couldn't see where most of that was coming from and I shouldn't have to be guessing.

Draw the part of the diagram you are dealing with and justify each step before you go on.
 
Interesting vk6kro because:

[tex]R_{eq}^{-1} = 2500^{-1} +500^{-1}+1000^{-1} =.0034[/tex]

and

[tex].0034^{-1}=294.1176471=\frac{5000}{17}[/tex]

how'd you get 263?

@Ninja IPGO, I am currently taking electrical fundamentals for the first time (i don't know what class you are taking but it looks much the same) and we can use any 'tools' we have to solve any of the problems. Why would there be a problem combining resistors in this problem? It is what you would do in a similar real life situation.

edit: what i really meant is if the problem says 'use mesh analysis to solve for i0 an v0' we could most certainly combine resistors to solve the problem, just not use node voltage. I don't see using voltage, current division or series/parallel combination as 'not using the method specified'.
 
You have in parallel:

(1500 + 1000), 2500, 500, 1000 ohms

And this gives 263.158 ohms.

You put this in series with the 750 ohms across 100 volts to get the voltage at node b.

Then you have 2500 ohms in series with 1000 ohms across this voltage to get the voltage at node c.
 
oh i see, i was just combining the 2.5k 500 and 1k resistors, to combine the rest does not seem to be a productive way to getting to the end quickly
 
But, you have to include the two series resistors to get the first voltage divider resistors.

You have 750 ohms then in series with 263 ohms across 100 volts. It is easy to work out the voltage across the 263 ohms. (100 times 263/1013)

Now that you know this voltage, it is across all the resistors in parallel including the two that are in series with each other.
So, they form a new divider and you can work out the voltage across the 1000 ohm resistor.
(100 times 263/1013) times 1000/2500.

It is so easy, you just write down the answers off the calculator.
 
While your method is not wrong i maintain mine is much quicker and more efficient. I did a schematic in LTspice of this circuit and using my method works just fine. No need to combine them all man.
 
  • #10
i redid the problem there was a few algebraic errors but the method i used is correct
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K