Use of capillarity in pumping water

  • Thread starter Thread starter vinay ks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Water
AI Thread Summary
Capillarity can effectively raise water, but it requires input energy to pump it to greater heights. The surface tension that draws water up also creates a strong attraction to the tube, necessitating energy to remove the water from the tube's top. In nature, plants utilize capillary action to transport water, relying on solar energy for this process. The discussion raises questions about the maximum height achievable through capillarity alone and the potential of using very small diameter tubes. Automatic plant wetting systems demonstrate practical applications of capillary effects in moving water.
vinay ks
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
capillarity has the power to raise water.. then can it be used to pump water to greater heights?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, but it takes input energy. The same surface tension which draws it up also keeps it strongly attracted to the tube at the top. Energy has to be used to get it out of the tube.

In plants, capillary action pumps water and the input energy is the sun (evaporation, etc).
 
yeah right! but what is the maximum limit upto which u can raise water just using capillarity and without the aid of external energy?? isn't it possible by making a tube of very small diameter??
 
There are automatic plant wetting systems that use capillary effects, they do move water up to some extent. Actually up to now I have never thought about the way they work from the energy point of view.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top