Use of energy or force in spring question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the force constant of a bungee cord for a jumper who must stop 4m above a river. The initial calculation using Hooke's law was deemed incorrect because it did not account for the jumper's inertia after falling. It is emphasized that stopping a moving object requires more force than simply holding it up. The conversation highlights the importance of using energy considerations in dynamic scenarios, as static force calculations can lead to overshooting and potential danger. Ultimately, the choice between using force or energy depends on whether the situation involves static or dynamic conditions.
frostchaos123
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Question is:
A balloon is 36m on top of a river, a bungee jumper has a unstretched cord of 25m attached to him and his weight is 700n

If he is to stop 4m above the river what should the force constant of the cord be?

My calculation is that since the cord can only extend 7m, using hooke's law I equate 700n = -k * 7 which gives 100. However I was told that the force method is not correct and I should consider energy at start and end points instead.

So my question why is the force reasoning incorrect and if there is a general way to tell how to choose, whether by force or by energy to solve a given problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That would be correct if the 700N man was statically loaded (i.e. wasn't dropped or falling). But since he is dropped from some height that person with the stiffness you calculated would overshoot and crash into the ground because he has inertia. It takes more force to stop something moving than to hold something up if that makes sense.
 
I see. In this case would it be correct to say that force should not be used, because even though the forces cancel out each other, there is a residual velocity that continues downwards and crash the person into the ground?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top