Use of magnets to create power?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bogus313
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnets Power
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of using fixed magnets to create propulsion or power generation. Participants explore various ideas related to the potential of permanent magnets, the principles of magnetism, and the concept of perpetual motion, while addressing misconceptions about energy generation from magnets.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses interest in creating a power generator using only fixed magnets and acknowledges that their ideas may be fundamentally flawed.
  • Another participant argues that permanent magnets do not provide usable energy and that an external energy input is necessary for power generation.
  • A participant clarifies that permanent magnets do not emit energy and compares their function to that of a static object, emphasizing the need for an external force to create motion.
  • There is a suggestion that many attempts to create motors powered solely by permanent magnets have failed due to the static nature of their magnetic fields.
  • One participant proposes a self-feeding loop using multiple magnets and an electromagnet, despite recognizing the challenges of perpetual motion.
  • Another participant strongly advises against pursuing perpetual motion concepts, citing the historical failures of similar attempts.
  • One participant discusses the process of magnetization and the limited energy that can be extracted from a magnet, suggesting an experiment involving coils and magnetic flux detection.
  • A later reply recommends a book on magnetic measurements as a resource for further understanding magnetism.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the potential for using fixed magnets to generate power, with some emphasizing the impossibility of perpetual motion and others exploring theoretical ideas. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the feasibility of the proposed concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants express various assumptions about energy sources and the mechanics of magnetism, with some acknowledging misconceptions in their understanding. The discussion highlights the complexity of energy transfer and the limitations of using permanent magnets in power generation.

bogus313
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi

i have just joined and this is my first post.I was hoping to find out if anyone has(using only fixed magnets) created a propulsion or any kind of power generator.I have a few ideas that id like to try, although there probably fundamentally flawed, if no one else has achieved it. All and any advice would be greatly recieved.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Magnets are used to transfer power from power plants to homes and business all the time. But a fixed magnet won't do much.

To supply power you need an input of power, or energy. There isn't much usable energy in a permanent magnet at all.
 
bogus313 said:
Hi

i have just joined and this is my first post.I was hoping to find out if anyone has(using only fixed magnets) created a propulsion or any kind of power generator.I have a few ideas that id like to try, although there probably fundamentally flawed, if no one else has achieved it. All and any advice would be greatly recieved.

The thing to understand is that a permanent magnet is not emanating any kind of energy, nor is the field changing or in motion. It's actually as static a phenomenon as a brick.

Magnets seem to emanate a kind of "force field" that should represent energy, but the fact is it doesn't. It won't repel another magnet, for example, unless some outside force first pushes the other magnet into range. This is no different than compressing a spring, or lifting a brick against gravity and dropping it. The outside force is the one supplying the energy.

Regardless, people have been trying to create motors powered exclusively by permanant magnets since they were discovered (I've read claims going back to the 1200's anyway). No one has succeeded for the same reason the brick powered motor has never worked.

Electric motors work by magnetic fields because, being electrically generated, they can be switched on and off, or from one polarity to the other quickly and conveniently, and it is that constant changing of the field that you need to create continuous motion. You can't substitute permanent magnets with their static fields for the 'changing field' coils in a motor and expect to get any motion out of it.

On the other hand, if you think you've found a way around any principle that seems to be in the way, I'd encourage you to try to make a working embodiment. You'll either 1.) succeed, or 2.) learn something.
 
thank you for your help.I realized a few mistakes id made last night.I know that magnets don't expel energy and it was my wording that was the problem.i was thinking along the lines of 2/3 permanent magnets(maybe 1 electromagnet powered by the output after the initial input). I was hoping to use their constant expulsion/retraction with a self feeding loop which after reaching a certain speed would create a constant surplus of energy.Yes i know perpetual motion isn't supposed to be workable on Earth but I am hoping i might of spied a way o do it.
 
You most assuredly have not. I advise you to simply turn away from even attempting that road, as it will do nothing but lead to failure. Many thousands of amateurs, and even a few professionals, have been down it before simply because they don't know enough about how it works to see that it won't work. Since perpetual motion machines are against the rules for discussing, I advise you to do a google search for sites explaining why perpetual motion doesn't work.
 
bogus313 said:
thank you for your help.I realized a few mistakes id made last night.I know that magnets don't expel energy and it was my wording that was the problem.i was thinking along the lines of 2/3 permanent magnets(maybe 1 electromagnet powered by the output after the initial input). I was hoping to use their constant expulsion/retraction with a self feeding loop which after reaching a certain speed would create a constant surplus of energy.Yes i know perpetual motion isn't supposed to be workable on Earth but I am hoping i might of spied a way o do it.

Somewhere in all this, though, you are still making the assumption that magnets are an energy source. Otherwise, you couldn't be concluding there's a way to have a surplus.

I'm thinking what you may not realize is that it takes more energy to push a magnet relative to a coil when you are drawing electricity from the coil than when you aren't. The harder it is to push, the more electricity you get. Generating electricity pushes back on the magnet and slows it down. The electricity isn't ever coming from the magnet, it comes from the energy it takes to push the magnet. The magnet is just a tool that reaches into the wire so you can push the electrons around.
 
To bounce off of what zoobyshoe said, think of the magnets as a way to apply a force without having to physically touch something. So they are glorified sticks. You can hit a rock with a stick but it isn't the stick itself that's generating any energy, it is merely transferring it from you to the rock. Without someone behind the stick to make it work, it will never hit the rock.
 
bogus313 said:
Yes i know perpetual motion isn't supposed to be workable on Earth but I am hoping i might of spied a way o do it.
We won't help you with this. It is a waste of your time and ours. Thread locked.
 
There's a magnet factory near my home. I enjoy watching them make permanent magnets which they do by placing the megnetic material inside a big coil and applying tremendous current.

I suppose that process does some work on the magnet, aligning all those dipoles.
And that energy might be stored in the magnetic field of the magnet.
The most energy you could extract from a magnet would be however much work had been done in magnetizing it, when you de-magnetize it
which isn't a lot.
And you won't won't recover even that much.

There's an experiment decribed in freshman physics books
one wraps two coils of several turns each around a bar of iron,
connects an amplifier and speaker to one,
and applies a very slowly increasing DC current to the other.
The speaker will give "clicks" as magnetism increases. The magnetic realignment of atoms in the iron isn't entirely smooth but proceeds in a "grainy" manner, and the second coil detects those sudden little upward ticks of magnetic flux. .

Give it a try
and read up on magnetism.

In fact I am going to recommend Jack M Janicke's "Magnetic Measurements Handbook" it is best layman's introduction i have ever seen .
I got so interested i built his Fluxgate Magnetometer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
152
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K