Using BEC to Propel a Solar Sail - What Do You Think?

Yum Yum
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
This is kind of a weird question, so I'll just throw it out there. So I was talking to my mate about BEC a couple of weeks ago and he proposed an interesting idea. I was telling him how BEC was used to slow down light to 38mph, what he suggested was using this concept to move a solar sail. So my question is, would the acceleration gained by light passing through the BEC have a greater impact on the solar sail than the idea of light propulsion already does? I have no idea about things on this kind of level so it would be interesting to know people's opinions on this as BEC is interesting enough as it is.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yum Yum said:
This is kind of a weird question, so I'll just throw it out there. So I was talking to my mate about BEC a couple of weeks ago and he proposed an interesting idea. I was telling him how BEC was used to slow down light to 38mph, what he suggested was using this concept to move a solar sail. So my question is, would the acceleration gained by light passing through the BEC have a greater impact on the solar sail than the idea of light propulsion already does? I have no idea about things on this kind of level so it would be interesting to know people's opinions on this as BEC is interesting enough as it is.
That way of moving a solar sail would be less efficient than an absorbing body, which is, in turn, less efficient than a solar sail: in the first case the body acquire the light's momentum, in the second, the double of it. With a BEC, it would acquire almost the momentum of the first case.
 
Hmm, so light traveling at a constant speed would have a greater effect on the sail than light being slowed down by the BEC?
 
Yum Yum said:
Hmm, so light traveling at a constant speed would have a greater effect on the sail than light being slowed down by the BEC?
No, the problem is different: with a solar sail you have light reflected back from the sail, so the momentum gained from the sail is 2p where p is the initial light's momentum: since light is reflected, its momentum change from +p to -p, ; for the momentum conservation's law, the total momentum must be the same before and after reflection, so the sail must acquire a momentum p:

p(sail) + p(light after reflection) = light's momentum before reflection = p
that is:
p(sail) + (-p) = p --> p(sail) = 2p.

In the case of total light's absorption:

p(sail) + p(light after absorption) = light's momentum before absorption = p
that is:
p(sail) + 0 = p --> p(sail) = p

In the case of partial light's absorption, without reflection, so that the other (non absorbed) part of light goes through the semi-transparent body without interacting with it, we have:

p(body) + p(light after partial interaction) = p
that is:
p(body) + x*p = p, where 0 < x < 1 --> p(body) = p(1 - x) < p.

The case you propose, with BEC, should be considered as the last I wrote.

You can yourself compute the case of partial absorption and partial reflection.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top