Using Dirac Bracket: Books & References for Examples

  • Thread starter Thread starter aries0152
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bracket Dirac
aries0152
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I have searched in web and go through some papers. But the use of Dirac Bracket in constraint still unclear to me. It would be better if I have some examples.

Can anyone please help me by suggesting books/references where I can find details about using Dirac Bracket?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aries0152 said:
But the use of Dirac Bracket in constraint still unclear to me.
Can anyone please help me by suggesting books/references where I can find details about using Dirac Bracket?

What do you mean by constraint? Plz elaborate

Can anyone please help me by suggesting books/references where I can find details about using Dirac Bracket?

Wikipedia article is reasonably good.
 
The Dirac bracket provides the means to develop the Hamiltonian formalism for any Lagrangian system, for it generalizes the symplectic structure on the phase space. It can therefore serve as a tool in quantization of constrained systems.

There are a few books dealing with this subject that I know of, but I only reccomend Dirac's 1964 lectures and Henneaux & Teitelboim's <Quantization of Gauge Systems>. The latter contains an extended treatment of the BRST symmetry which is an alternative to the Dirac bracket for 1st class systems.
 
You could see Weinberg I, chapter 7,8 to find examples. In simple words, the idea to quantize constrained systems is to do canonical transformations, making constraints the forms that just fix the values of several couples of conjugate variables, and to remove these couples. This method is equal to using Dirac brackets, of which details can be found in Weinberg I, and generally we'll use Dirac brackets. To addition, since poisson brackets could not be changed because of canonical transformations, 1st class constraints usually mean a lack of constraints to constrain both a variable and its conjugation, so we should add certain gauges as additional constraints.
 
A good paper to start on this topic is http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9606031
Then move onto the couple of textbooks on Dirac Quantization.

Here's the references used for a half-complete set of notes I wrote up on Dirac's canonical quantization.

[1] P. A. M. Dirac, “Lectures on Quantum Mechanics,” Belfer Graduate School of Science Monograph Series (1964)
[2] H. J. Matschull, “Dirac’s canonical quantization programme,” arXiv:quant-ph/9606031.
[3] K. Sundermeyer, “Constrained Dynamics With Applications To Yang-Mills Theory, General Relativity, Classical
Spin, Dual String Model,” Lect. Notes Phys. 169 (1982) 1.
[4] M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, “Quantization of gauge systems,” Princeton, USA: Univ. Pr. (1992) 520 p
[5] A. Hanson, T. Regge and C. Teitelboim, “Constrained Hamiltonian systems,” Accademia nazionale dei lincei
(1976)

Dirac's lecture notes [1] are a good read.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top