Using e^ix to determine a trig identity

  • Thread starter Thread starter josephcollins
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity Trig
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on expressing cosine and sine in terms of complex exponentials, specifically e^ix and e^-ix. It confirms that cos(x) can be represented as the real part of e^ix and e^-ix, while sin(x) is the imaginary part of these expressions. The goal is to demonstrate the identity 16cos^3(x)sin^2(x) = 2cos(x) - cos(3x) - cos(5x) using these relationships. The conversation emphasizes the importance of rearranging the exponential forms to derive sine and cosine identities. Understanding these connections is essential for proving various trigonometric identities.
josephcollins
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
Hi people, could someone help me with this

Q. Write cosx and sinx in terms of e^ix and e^-ix respectively

So I wrote that cosx=Re(e^ix)=Re(e^-ix)

and sinx =Im(e^ix) and -Im(e^ix)

I think the above identites are correct, now I must use this to show that

16cos^3(x)sin^2(x) = 2cosx - cos3x - cos5x
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
e^{ix} = \cos x + i \sin x

e^{-ix} = \cos x - i \sin x

Look at the two above and think how you could rearrange them so you have one for sin(x) in terms of e^(ix) and e^(-ix) and same for cos(x).
 
also remember, e^{inx} = \cos(nx) + i\sin(nx) = (e^{ix})^n. This is all you need to find any trig identity...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top