Using given Fourier transform to find the equation for the wave packet.

Jennifer_ea
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Any wavepacket can be obtained by the superposition of an infinite number of plane waves using the so-called Fourier integral or Fourier transform
f(x,t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} _{-\infty}\int^\infty A(k)e^{i(kx-\omega t)} dk

Find at t=0 the representation of the wavepacket f(x) associated with the flat distribution given by:

A(k) =
0 for k<-K and k>K
\frac{1}{\sqrt{2K}} for -K < k < K

Homework Equations


The textbook I found that isn't leaving me entirely confused has replaced k with p (momentum), but that doesn't seem to be overly relevant to my lack of understanding. The one I've found that seem to be in the ball park is:
\left|A(p,t)^2\right| = \left|A(p)e^{\frac{ip^{2}t}{2mh-bar}}\right|^2 = \left| A(p,0) \right|^2


The Attempt at a Solution


I have figured out that A(k) is the Fourier transform, but after that I run into a brick wall. I can't even seem to get far enough to be able to make useful searches. I'm getting the impression that I need to do some more manipulation so that I can use the above equation, but right now it'd just be blind hammering without understanding why.

I feel like there may have a linking concept I'm not getting, even just a nudge in the right direction would be extremely helpful!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've been given A(k), and a formula that describes f(x,t) in terms of it. So finding f(x,0) should just be a matter of plugging things in.

Since t=0, you can drop the \omega t term from the integral. So right off the bat, we have:
f(x, 0) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} A(k)e^{ikx} dk

Now, see if you can determine how the integral is affected by substituting in the definition of A(k).
 
Wow, I was so focused on trying to figure out what the transform did that I completely overlooked the basics. Did not cross my mind once about the omega disappearing.

Thanks a bunch! You're right, it's just simple substitution now. Lesson learned!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top