- #1
phasor
- 3
- 0
Sorry if this is the wrong place to ask this, but I think linear algebra is the best place to ask my question. Feel free to move this thread elsewhere if I am wrong.
I would like to know how I can use linear algebra to help me figure out when I am deriving an equation if the derivation I would like to have is possible. So, if I have a relation with variables x and y, is it possible to express y in terms of only x? The other way around?
Keplers Equation makes a good example: M = E - e*Sin(E). (e is eccentricity). M can be expressed in terms of E, but because this equation is transcendental E cannot be expressed in terms of M. That's easy enough to see here, but what if I have complicated expressions for M and E, and I am trying to derive Kepler's equation? Is there a theorem I can apply to figure out, before doing lots of algebra, that E cannot be expressed in terms of only M?
Thanks for the help.
I would like to know how I can use linear algebra to help me figure out when I am deriving an equation if the derivation I would like to have is possible. So, if I have a relation with variables x and y, is it possible to express y in terms of only x? The other way around?
Keplers Equation makes a good example: M = E - e*Sin(E). (e is eccentricity). M can be expressed in terms of E, but because this equation is transcendental E cannot be expressed in terms of M. That's easy enough to see here, but what if I have complicated expressions for M and E, and I am trying to derive Kepler's equation? Is there a theorem I can apply to figure out, before doing lots of algebra, that E cannot be expressed in terms of only M?
Thanks for the help.