Using Properties of Logarithms

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on simplifying the logarithmic expression log_{5}(1/250) using properties of logarithms. Participants clarify the application of the quotient property, leading to the expression log_{5}(1) - log_{5}(250). The prime factorization of 250 is discussed, revealing it as 5^3 * 2, which aids in further simplification. Ultimately, the correct simplification results in -3 - log_{5}(2) after recognizing that log_{5}(1) equals zero. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding logarithmic properties and proper expression evaluation.
FritoTaco
Messages
132
Reaction score
23

Homework Statement


[/B]
Question: Use the properties of logarithms to rewrite and simplify the logarithmic expression.

1. log_{5}\dfrac{1}{250}

Homework Equations


Product Property: log_{a}(uv) = log_{a}u + log_{a}v
Quotient Property: log_{a}\dfrac{u}{v} = log_{a}u - log_{a}v
Power Property: log_{a}u^{k} = k\cdot log_{a}u

The Attempt at a Solution



log_{5}1 - log_{5}250

I know when it's dividing, you split it up by subtracting. (Still not confident in the first step) Do I find out 5 to what power gives it 250? Even if I did that, it won't match 250. Pretty sure I'm missing something I'm unaware of.

Answer: -3 - log_{5}2
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0068.JPG
    IMG_0068.JPG
    21.1 KB · Views: 434
Physics news on Phys.org
FritoTaco said:

Homework Statement


[/B]
Question: Use the properties of logarithms to rewrite and simplify the logarithmic expression.

1. log_{5}\dfrac{1}{250}

Homework Equations


Product Property: log_{a}(uv) = log_{a}u + log_{a}v
Quotient Property: log_{a}\dfrac{u}{v} = log_{a}u - log_{a}v
Power Property: log_{a}u^{k} = k\cdot log_{a}u

The Attempt at a Solution



log_{5}1 - log_{5}250

I know when it's dividing, you split it up by subtracting. (Still not confident in the first step) Do I find out 5 to what power gives it 250? Even if I did that, it won't match 250. Pretty sure I'm missing something I'm unaware of.

Answer: -3 - log_{5}2
What is the prime factorization of 250 ?
 
  • Like
Likes FritoTaco
SammyS said:
What is the prime factorization of 250 ?

2, 5
 
Consider the integer factorization. And how else can you write ##\frac{1}{250}##?
 
  • Like
Likes FritoTaco
Maybe this: 5^{3} \cdot 2

I don't know how to flip it so it's 1/250. That's why I separated them.
 
Better. And now ##\frac{1}{5^3\,\cdot\,2}## and your rules can be applied.
 
  • Like
Likes FritoTaco
FritoTaco said:
2, 5
No. Those are the prime factors, but 2⋅5 = 10, not 250.

Do a factor tree.

How many factors of 2 and how many factors of 5 ?

Added in Edit:

I see you have it now.
 
  • Like
Likes FritoTaco
FritoTaco said:
Maybe this: 5^{3} \cdot 2

I don't know how to flip it so it's 1/250. That's why I separated them.
Not that important. You can use rule two as well. Just know what ##\log_5 1## and ##\log_5 5## is.
 
  • Like
Likes FritoTaco
Okay thanks guys, so...

\dfrac{1}{{5^{3}}\cdot2}
= log_{5}5^{3}-log_{5}5^{2}
= 3log_{5}5 - 2log_{5}5

I'm closer, but still stuck on getting the correct answer, is this good so far?
 
  • #10
FritoTaco said:
Okay thanks guys, so...

\dfrac{1}{{5^{3}}\cdot2}
= log_{5}5^{3}-log_{5}5^{2}
That's not what the quotient rule says, and what you did right the first time.
= 3log_{5}5 - 2log_{5}5

I'm closer, but still stuck on getting the correct answer, is this good so far?
Apply them one at a time: quotient rule - product rule - special cases. And don't forget parentheses when in doubt.
 
  • Like
Likes FritoTaco
  • #11
Ok, so I see an error. I have a 5 base 5 in the second half of step 2. I think it should be log_{5}5^{3}-log_{5}2, then 3log_{5}5^{}-log_{5}2. Okay, but how do I get rid of the 5 and have a negative sign in front of the 3?
 
  • #12
FritoTaco said:
Okay thanks guys, so...
\dfrac{1}{{5^{3}}\cdot2} =log_{5}5^{3}-log_{5}5^{2}...

I'm closer, but still stuck on getting the correct answer, is this good so far?
Your mistakes are in the quoted step.

You used the quotient rule correctly in the OP, when you obtained
## \log_{5}1 - \log_{5}250 ##​
Now use the factorization of 250: 2⋅53 to deconstruct log5(250).

Notice:
2 is not an exponent. It's a coefficient.​
.
 
  • Like
Likes FritoTaco
  • #13
Okay, so I have this so far: log_{5}1-log_{5}250 log_{5}1-log_{5}(5^{3}\cdot2) log_{5}5^{3}-log_{5}2 3log_{5}5-log_{5}2
 
  • #14
FritoTaco said:
Okay, so I have this so far: log_{5}1-log_{5}250 log_{5}1-log_{5}(5^{3}\cdot2) log_{5}5^{3}-log_{5}2 3log_{5}5-log_{5}2
Look at ##\ \log_5(250) = ... \ ## by itself. Then consider that it all comes from the denominator.
 
  • Like
Likes FritoTaco
  • #15
Does that mean if it comes from denominator the whole solution becomes negative?
 
  • #16
FritoTaco said:
Okay thanks guys, so...

##\frac{1}{{5^{3}}\cdot2}##
The line above should be ##\log_5 \frac{1}{{5^{3}}\cdot2}##
FritoTaco said:
= ##log_{5}5^{3}-log_{5}5^{2}##
No. The thing you're taking the log of is a quotient that also includes a product.
FritoTaco said:
= ##3log_{5}5 - 2log_{5}5##

I'm closer, but still stuck on getting the correct answer, is this good so far?
You're using tags, which causes the rendered expressions to be centered on their own line. For these equations, (inline LaTeX) would look better, IMO. It's simpler to surround the material with $$ (standalone) or ## (inline) tags.
 
  • Like
Likes FritoTaco and jim mcnamara
  • #17
Okay, guys. This is as far as my knowledge takes me. log_{5}\dfrac{1}{250}
log_{5}1-log_{5}(5^{3}\cdot2)
log_{5}1-log_{5}5^{3}+log_{5}2
log_{5}1-3log_{5}5+log_{5}2 (log 5 base 5 cancels out)
-3+log_{5}2
So which step did I go wrong? Also, thanks for the information, I was wondering how to format it.
 
  • #18
FritoTaco said:
Okay, guys. This is as far as my knowledge takes me. log_{5}\dfrac{1}{250}
log_{5}1-log_{5}(5^{3}\cdot2)
Above is fine, but why not simplify it instead of dragging along ##\log_5(1)##? Do you know what this equals?
The work below contains an error. The fact that you're dragging along ##\log_5(1)## probably contributed to this error.
FritoTaco said:
log_{5}1-log_{5}5^{3}+log_{5}2
log_{5}1-3log_{5}5+log_{5}2 (log 5 base 5 cancels out)
-3+log_{5}2
So which step did I go wrong? Also, thanks for the information, I was wondering how to format it.
 
  • Like
Likes FritoTaco
  • #19
Doesn't log_{5}1 equal zero? I ignored it when solving the rest of the equation.
 
  • #20
FritoTaco said:
Doesn't log_{5}1 equal zero? I ignored it when solving the rest of the equation.
Yes, that's the right value.

Here's the work you showed in post#17.
FritoTaco said:
log_{5}1-log_{5}(5^{3}\cdot2)
log_{5}1-log_{5}5^{3}+log_{5}2
log_{5}1-3log_{5}5+log_{5}2 (log 5 base 5
Dragging ##\log_5(1)## along in each of these steps probably caused the error I mentioned.

BTW you are not "solving the equation." You are evaluating an expression; namely ##\log_5(\frac 1 {250})##. Solving an equation and evaluating or simplifying an expression are two completely different concepts.

Here's a better start to this problem:
##\log_5(\frac 1 {250})##
##= \log_5(1) - \log_5(250)##
## = -\log_5(250)##
## = \dots ##
 
  • Like
Likes FritoTaco
  • #21
Yes! It has finally arrived!:

log_{5}(\dfrac{1}{250})
= log_{5}(1)-log_{5}(250)
= -log_{5}(250)
= -log_{5}(5^{3}\cdot2)
= -log_{5}5^3-log_{5}2
= -3-log_{5}2

Thank you for your help people!
 
  • Like
Likes SammyS
  • #22
FritoTaco said:
Yes! It has finally arrived!:

log_{5}(\dfrac{1}{250})
= log_{5}(1)-log_{5}(250)
= -log_{5}(250)
= -log_{5}(5^{3}\cdot2)
= -log_{5}5^3-log_{5}2
= -3-log_{5}2

Thank you for your help people!
Very good !

I think that one thing @fresh_42 was suggesting way back in post #4 or thereabouts was to write 1/(250) as (250)-1 .

Then you start with ##\ \displaystyle \log_5\left(\frac 1 {250} \right) = \log_5 (250^{-1})=(-1) \log_5 (250)= \ \dots##
 
  • Like
Likes FritoTaco
  • #23
SammyS said:
Very good !

I think that one thing @fresh_42 was suggesting way back in post #4 or thereabouts was to write 1/(250) as (250)-1 .

Then you start with ##\ \displaystyle \log_5\left(\frac 1 {250} \right) = \log_5 (250^{-1})=(-1) \log_5 (250)= \ \dots##
Oh, so that's another way to start. That makes sense. Time to practice more problems!
 
Back
Top