MHB Using Trigonometry for solving a Cubic equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a cubic equation using trigonometric methods. The user seeks assistance after transforming the cubic equation into a simpler form and expressing it in terms of cosine. A suggested substitution is \(y=2\sqrt{-\frac{p}{3}}\cos\theta\), which aligns with methods outlined in a referenced Wikipedia article. Participants confirm the validity of this substitution and emphasize its historical mathematical significance. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the substitution process for solving cubic equations.
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Dear Everyone,

I need some help for this general cubic equation.

\[ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0\]. First divide the equation by a
\[x^3+b/ax^2+c/ax+d/a=0\]

Let x=y-b/(3a)
...

$$y^3+py+q=0$$
where $$p=c/a-(b/a)^2)/3;q=d/a-(b/a*c/a)/3+(b/a)^3/27$$
$$y=cos \theta$$
then i need to use the identity for $$cos(3\theta)= 4cos^3(\theta)-3cos(\theta) $$

and that is where need the help.
What to do next?

Thank you for your patiences
Cbarker1
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I read that article already. I am still confuse with the substitution.
 
Cbarker1 said:
I read that article already. I am still confuse with the substitution.

Did you try the substitution $y=2\sqrt{-\frac p 3}\cos\theta$?
 
Why Do the substitution works?
 
Cbarker1 said:
Why Do the substitution works?

It is exactly the substitution the wiki article describes.
A great mathematician thought it up.
So yes, the substitution works.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top