Testing UT Austin Physics Credit Testing: What You Need to Know?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GNRtau
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around an incoming freshman at UT Austin seeking advice on the university's test for credit in physics, specifically mechanics and electromagnetism. There is a comparison made between this test and the AP Physics C Exam, with insights shared from students who have taken both. Some recommend retaking the classes even with AP credit, as they found the additional topics covered beneficial for their understanding and future courses. Others have successfully claimed credit and moved on, suggesting that individual study habits play a significant role in this decision. It is emphasized that students should not base their major decisions solely on the potential for earning credit, as engineering and physics offer distinct paths and opportunities. The importance of consulting with undergraduate physics advisors for clarification on credit transfer policies is also highlighted, along with the need for timely decision-making regarding course registration.
GNRtau
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have used this website a lot in the past year(and it's helped a lot, helped me to really self study physics/engineering/math stuff and helped me with choices in major), but this will be my first actual post... :blushing:

I am an incoming freshman at UT Austin and I was wondering if anyone here has taken the UT Austin test for credit in physics(both mech and E/M)? If so, what can you tell me about it? Is it a lot like the AP Physics C Exam? Also, if you have credit for PHY 301(physics physics), would that also count for PHY 303K(engineering physics) and vice versa? I am having a tough time choosing between majors and can only choose one with Physics C credit, and I don't want to have to retake stuff I know already...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Bump...
 
I will be a 2nd Physics major at UT in the fall and had a similar issue. I had gotten 5s on both the Mechanics and E&M AP test and chose to retake the classes at the recommendation of a physics advisor/professor. Turns out it was a good idea for me. We covered a few more important topics than what was covered by the AP test so it was completely worth it. I also formed a study group of Physics majors, and learned material that will be helpful later on in more advanced physics courses. A's also help your GPA out instead of claiming credit :smile:. On the flip side I do know physics majors who have claimed credit for both classes and moved on and they are doing just fine, which may depend on their study habits, and other criterion. I would certainly consider talking it again. But maybe not if you choose Engineering!

I'm fairly sure you can claim credit for PHY 303K and the one after that (Engineering Physics II?) and vise versa with PHY 301+Lab and Phy316+Lab. Don't take my word for it, I haven't seen the credit petition page in about a year. You can email any of the undergraduate physics advisors, they work during the summer. I would head over to http://www.ph.utexas.edu/people-staff.php" and find some one to email there.

But most importantly I want to stress: do not make you decision solely on claiming credit for these two classes. Engineering and Physics are different departments, different opportunities, and different classes. Don't make you decision on a measly 6-8 credits.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks guys! I self-studied the courses in limited time(didn't even know Physics C existed until late in the game-crappy school system but that is beside the point), so maybe I should take the courses. On the other hand, I went over stuff that wasn't covered in the courses(but is in the courses, from what I can see of the lecture notes I have managed to get online), the books I used were pretty good, and I am continuing to go over it over the summer, so maybe I should pass out of the courses. Maybe I'll talk to an advisor and see how it goes... but on the other hand I hear that you register for courses right after the talk, so I going to try to get it as straigtened out as I can now.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
646
Back
Top