What is v(dv/dx) and how does it relate to acceleration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Big-Daddy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the expression v(dv/dx) as a model for acceleration, highlighting its derivation using the chain rule where v = dx/dt. This formulation is presented as equivalent to the traditional acceleration expression dv/dt, emphasizing its relevance in one-dimensional motion. The utility of v(dv/dx) is noted in scenarios involving air resistance and fluid dynamics, where traditional methods may struggle due to interdependencies between variables. It allows for the separation of differential equations, facilitating integrations in problems like gravitational attraction between masses. Overall, this approach offers a robust alternative for analyzing motion in complex systems.
Big-Daddy
Messages
333
Reaction score
1
My mechanics syllabus suggests that we can model acceleration as ##v(dv/dx)## but what exactly does this mean? Can you give me (or link me to) some explanations and/or sample problems with worked solutions? In my experience so far we should always be using ##dv/dt## for ##a##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider what v actually is in one dimension:
v = \dfrac{dx}{dt}.
So in using the chain rule,
v\dfrac{dv}{dx} = \dfrac{dx}{dt}\dfrac{dv}{dx} = \dfrac{dv}{dt} = a.
Of course, you could make the same argument with any spatial coordinate. This is intimately related to what is commonly called the material derivative.
 
boneh3ad said:
Consider what v actually is in one dimension:
v = \dfrac{dx}{dt}.
So in using the chain rule,
v\dfrac{dv}{dx} = \dfrac{dx}{dt}\dfrac{dv}{dx} = \dfrac{dv}{dt} = a.
Of course, you could make the same argument with any spatial coordinate. This is intimately related to what is commonly called the material derivative.

Thanks.

What would be the usefulness of something like this? Could you, for example, model motion with air resistance using it? (This is impossible with ##dv/dt## calculus since your balanced expression for acceleration would depend on -kv2, your air resistance, but then ##v## depends on acceleration, meaning the model cannot incorporate air resistance.)
 
Suppose you have a stream of some fluid and you know the velocity field. You would like to know the acceleration of (and hence the forces on) some bit of fluid as it passes by a certain point. This formulation is useful.
 
It's useful when separating differential equations like the following:

a=\frac{k}{r^2}

So you can integrate:

vdv=\frac{k}{r^2}dr

This is used, for example, with finding the time it takes for two masses to come together under gravity.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top