Can Vacuum Pockets Make Objects Float?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rollcast
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Objects with pockets of trapped vacuum can theoretically float if their overall density is lower than the surrounding medium. However, the material needed to contain the vacuum must be strong enough to withstand external pressure, which adds weight that may negate the buoyancy effect. While hydrogen is lightweight and could provide buoyancy, its combustibility and cost are significant drawbacks. Heated air offers a more practical alternative for buoyancy, as seen in hot air balloons, due to its lower density when heated. Understanding the necessary material properties for a vacuum-containing structure involves examining tensile and compressive strengths to ensure it can withstand pressure differences.
rollcast
Messages
403
Reaction score
0
Would it be possible for an object with pockets of trapped vacuum space be able to float just the way air pockets do as it is less dense?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes.

A simple explanation, the ability to float relies on a difference in density. As long as the object with a vacuum internally has a lower density than the surrounding medium, it will float.
 
rc1102 said:
Would it be possible for an object with pockets of trapped vacuum space be able to float just the way air pockets do as it is less dense?

Thanks

Be aware that such a scenario requires material to contain the vacuum.
That material has weight.
I'll leave it to you to go from there.
 
Thanks light bulb moment, the weight of the material need to resist the compressive forces around the vacuum far outweigh any reduced density you achieve from it
 
rc1102 said:
Thanks light bulb moment, the weight of the material need to resist the compressive forces around the vacuum far outweigh any reduced density you achieve from it

Good job!
 
Yep. In theory, with a material that is strong enough you could create a chamber using so little material that it is bouyant. (Or more accurately, its total mass is less than that of the same volume of air.)

Problem is, it would surely be extremely delicate. The slightest bump would likely cause it to deform and implode.

This is why hydrogen makes such a great runner-up. It's the lightest element known that can provide an atmospheric pressure so that the walls don't even need to be rigid. Just that darn combustibility...
 
DaveC426913 said:
This is why hydrogen makes such a great runner-up. It's the lightest element known that can provide an atmospheric pressure so that the walls don't even need to be rigid. Just that darn combustibility...

And cost. Hydrogen is expensive, and leaks through common membranes.
Heated air seems to produce similar bouyancy effects with a reduced TOTAL cost?

Just asking... not sure.
 
pallidin said:
And cost. Hydrogen is expensive, and leaks through common membranes.
Heated air seems to produce similar bouyancy effects with a reduced TOTAL cost?

Just asking... not sure.

Heated air becomes less dense, causing it to rise in the air. This is how hot air balloons work. You just have to heat it which CAN be less expensive.
 
Helium is the next lightest and has the nice feature of not being so flammable!

Out of interest does anybody know how we could work out the necessary material properties of a vacuum containing balloon?
 
  • #10
You mean to contain the vacuum or its lift/bouyancy
 
  • #11
ryan_m_b said:
Helium is the next lightest and has the nice feature of not being so flammable!

Out of interest does anybody know how we could work out the necessary material properties of a vacuum containing balloon?

Well, it must be non-porous, so that there is no gas transport across it. It must have sufficient compressive and shear strength (I think those are the right terms) to withstand the pressure difference of 15 psi (1 atm) pushing from outside to the inside. "Balloon" seems like the wrong word, since balloons have an opposite pressure differential ...
 
  • #12
SpectraCat said:
Well, it must be non-porous, so that there is no gas transport across it. It must have sufficient compressive and shear strength (I think those are the right terms) to withstand the pressure difference of 15 psi (1 atm) pushing from outside to the inside. "Balloon" seems like the wrong word, since balloons have an opposite pressure differential ...

Good ideas. I was wondering what physical properties our material would need in terms of tensile strength etc. I use the word balloon only in the sense of if it would be possible to make a buoyant vacuum pockets
 
  • #13
ryan_m_b said:
Good ideas. I was wondering what physical properties our material would need in terms of tensile strength etc. I use the word balloon only in the sense of if it would be possible to make a buoyant vacuum pockets

You can start by examining how a common egg gets its compressive strength. It is structurally equivalent to a stone archway with no endpoints.
 
  • #14
rc1102 said:
Thanks light bulb moment, the weight of the material need to resist the compressive forces around the vacuum far outweigh any reduced density you achieve from it

The standard experiment to show that this is likely to be true with normal materials is to put a little water in a good-sized tin can (say a 2-gallon gas can) with a small top, heat the water until it has all become steam and driven out the air, and then close the can and watch the can implode.
 
Back
Top