rollcast
- 403
- 0
Would it be possible for an object with pockets of trapped vacuum space be able to float just the way air pockets do as it is less dense?
Thanks
Thanks
rc1102 said:Would it be possible for an object with pockets of trapped vacuum space be able to float just the way air pockets do as it is less dense?
Thanks
rc1102 said:Thanks light bulb moment, the weight of the material need to resist the compressive forces around the vacuum far outweigh any reduced density you achieve from it
DaveC426913 said:This is why hydrogen makes such a great runner-up. It's the lightest element known that can provide an atmospheric pressure so that the walls don't even need to be rigid. Just that darn combustibility...
pallidin said:And cost. Hydrogen is expensive, and leaks through common membranes.
Heated air seems to produce similar bouyancy effects with a reduced TOTAL cost?
Just asking... not sure.
ryan_m_b said:Helium is the next lightest and has the nice feature of not being so flammable!
Out of interest does anybody know how we could work out the necessary material properties of a vacuum containing balloon?
SpectraCat said:Well, it must be non-porous, so that there is no gas transport across it. It must have sufficient compressive and shear strength (I think those are the right terms) to withstand the pressure difference of 15 psi (1 atm) pushing from outside to the inside. "Balloon" seems like the wrong word, since balloons have an opposite pressure differential ...
ryan_m_b said:Good ideas. I was wondering what physical properties our material would need in terms of tensile strength etc. I use the word balloon only in the sense of if it would be possible to make a buoyant vacuum pockets
rc1102 said:Thanks light bulb moment, the weight of the material need to resist the compressive forces around the vacuum far outweigh any reduced density you achieve from it