Validity of Two-Fermion System Wavefunction with Quantum Numbers a and b

AI Thread Summary
The validity of the two-body wavefunction for a two-fermion system is questioned, specifically whether it correctly describes a possible state. The wavefunction must be antisymmetric under the interchange of particles, meaning that swapping the particles should yield a negative of the original wavefunction. The proposed wavefunction does not satisfy this antisymmetry condition, indicating it cannot describe a valid quantum state for fermions. Therefore, the statement regarding the wavefunction's correctness is false. The discussion emphasizes the importance of antisymmetry in fermionic systems.
FilipLand
Messages
52
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Is the statement ”Given a two-fermion system, and two orbitals φ labeled by quantum numbers a, b, the two-body wavefunction (1,2 represent the particle variables)

$$\psi(1,2) = \phi_a(1) \phi_a(2) - \phi_b(1) \phi_b(2) + \phi_a(1) \phi_b(2) - \phi_b(1) \phi_a(2) $$

correctly describes a possible state of the system” true or false ? Explain your answer

Homework Equations


I think this should be done by arguing so so relevant equations.

The Attempt at a Solution


There's a few of these problems with different wave functions. I'm not sure how to approach these problems.

Maybe by noticing that input (1,2) as not consistent to $\phi_a$ and $\phi_b$, respectively and can hence not describe a quantum state?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The wavefunction of a fermionic system must be antisymmetric in the interchange of fermions, in your case the wavefunction should satisfy
$$
\psi(1,2) = -\psi(2,1).
$$
You just need to check whether the above relation is satisfied.
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude
Thank you!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top