Vanishing Wavefunction: Show Expectation Values of x and p Vanish

  • Thread starter Thread starter misterpickle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wavefunction
misterpickle
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If <x> and <p> are the expectation values of x and p formed with the wave-function of a one-dimensional system, show that the expectation value of x and p formed with the wave-function vanishes. The wavefunction is:

\phi(x)=exp(-\frac{i}{h}\langle p\rangle x)\psi(x+\langle x\rangle)Basically I don't know how to start this problem. Do I plug in the integral forms of the expectation values into the exponential and distribute the psi over x and \langle x\rangle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You left out some important text, but I found the problem set with a google search. \langle x\rangle, \langle p\rangle are computed with the wavefunction \psi(x), i.e.

\langle x\rangle = \int x \psi^*(x) \psi(x) \, dx, \ldots

You are asked to compute expectation values with the wavefunction \phi(x):

\langle x\rangle_\phi = \int x \phi^*(x) \phi(x) \, dx, \ldots

These expressions can be reduced to expectation values for certain quantities in the wavefunction \psi(x). You don't have to do any integrals explicity, just some algebra and derivatives.
 
I've set it up the way you suggested, and the exponential terms computing \langle x \rangle cancel. However there is a \langle x \rangle term in \psi(x+\langle x \rangle). Is this not a discrepancy to have the value you are trying to calculate inside the equation for calculating its value?

Specifically,

\int{ x \psi^{*}(x+\langle x \rangle) \psi(x+\langle x \rangle)\,dx}
 
misterpickle said:
I've set it up the way you suggested, and the exponential terms computing \langle x \rangle cancel. However there is a \langle x \rangle term in \psi(x+\langle x \rangle). Is this not a discrepancy to have the value you are trying to calculate inside the equation for calculating its value?

Specifically,

\int{ x \psi^{*}(x+\langle x \rangle) \psi(x+\langle x \rangle)\,dx}

Well \langle x \rangle is just a number (it came out of another integral over x, so it doesn't depend on x). There's still something you have to do to this integral though.
 
If \psi(x+\langle x \rangle) is distributable (meaning f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)) then I come up with the following:

\int{ x \psi^{*}(x+\langle x \rangle) \psi(x+\langle x \rangle)\,dx}
\int{ x[ (\psi^{*}x+\psi^{*}\langle x \rangle)( \psi x+\psi\langle x \rangle)\,dx}
\int{ (\psi^{*}\psi x^{3}+2\psi^{*}\psi x^{2}\langle x \rangle+\psi^{*}\psi x\langle x \rangle^{2})\,dx}
\langle x^{3}\rangle +2\langle x^{2}\langle x \rangle\rangle + \langle x\langle x\rangle^{2}\rangle

...which doesn't make any sense to me. Also the "distributable" assumption I made does not work for exponentials, since f(x+y)=f(x)f(y) for exponential functions.
 
Yeah wavefunctions will almost never have that property since they're always related to exponential functions. Think about how you can convert this to an expectation value in \psi(x) by making a substitution in the integration variable.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top