Vapor pressure in open container

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of vapor pressure in open containers, particularly in relation to boiling and the measurement of vapor pressure. Participants explore the differences between closed and open systems, the implications of boiling, and the conditions under which vapor pressure can be defined and understood.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about how boiling can be defined in an open container where vapor is dispersed into the atmosphere, questioning the relationship between vapor pressure and boiling point.
  • Others argue that boiling does not necessarily imply equilibrium, as the vapor pressure of a liquid is determined by its temperature regardless of the surrounding atmospheric pressure.
  • Participants discuss the measurement of vapor pressure in open systems, with some suggesting it is a known property that can be referenced from tables based on temperature.
  • There is a contention regarding the significance of bubbles forming below the surface of the liquid as an indicator of boiling, with some asserting that bubbles must form to indicate boiling, while others suggest that vapor escaping into the atmosphere is also relevant.
  • Clarifications are made about the equilibrium between the vapor pressure at the liquid's surface and the partial pressure of water vapor in the air above it, particularly at the air-liquid interface.
  • Some participants express difficulty in grasping the concept of vapor pressure in open systems, indicating a need for further explanation and understanding.
  • Discussions include the distinction between evaporation at the surface and the transport of vapor by bubbles during boiling, highlighting the differences in processes occurring at different temperatures.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the definitions and implications of vapor pressure in open containers, with multiple competing views and ongoing confusion about the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the complexity of defining vapor pressure in open systems, the dependence on temperature, and the lack of equilibrium between the liquid and the surrounding air. Unresolved questions about the measurement and interpretation of vapor pressure persist.

  • #31
Chestermiller said:
It doesn't have to be violent. Also, what is this about the pressure going negative? I can see the gauge pressure going negative, but not the absolute pressure (at least not in the kind of situations you are describing).
That was a statement with a condition -- if the fluid is to remain continuous, local pressure could be required to go negative. Under most conditions, local pressure cannot go negative. Voids will form and boiling will take place. However, in the absence of nucleation sites, negative absolute pressures become plausible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
jbriggs444 said:
That was a statement with a condition -- if the fluid is to remain continuous, local pressure could be required to go negative. Under most conditions, local pressure cannot go negative. Voids will form and boiling will take place. However, in the absence of nucleation sites, negative absolute pressures become plausible.
Wow. I never heard of that before. Any references?
 
  • #33
Chestermiller said:
Wow. I never heard of that before. Any references?
The statement was couched as "plausible" because I have no acceptable references. What I had in mind was capillary action.
 
  • #34
jbriggs444 said:
The statement was couched as "plausible" because I have no acceptable references. What I had in mind was capillary action.
I've, of course, heard of elastic solids being able to support negative absolute pressure, but I've never heard of purely viscous fluids being able to do this. The possibility of negative absolute pressure is not a feature of the rheological constitutive equation for an ideal viscous Newtonian fluid, or of the thermodynamic equation of state for a fluid. Maybe, for viscoelastic fluids, negative pressures might be possible.
 
  • #35
Chestermiller said:
I've, of course, heard of elastic solids being able to support negative absolute pressure, but I've never heard of purely viscous fluids being able to do this. The possibility of negative absolute pressure is not a feature of the rheological constitutive equation for an ideal viscous Newtonian fluid, or of the thermodynamic equation of state for a fluid. Maybe, for viscoelastic fluids, negative pressures might be possible.
There is a good deal of relevant discussion in https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/negative-pressure.428998/

In that thread Andy Resnick provides a reference to http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v278/n5700/abs/278148a0.html which discusses the tensile strength of water.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and Chestermiller
  • #36
jbriggs444 said:
There is a good deal of relevant discussion in https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/negative-pressure.428998/

In that thread Andy Resnick provides a reference to http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v278/n5700/abs/278148a0.html which discusses the tensile strength of water.
Oh yeah. I remember this thing now. I never bought into the explanation related to assuming that there is a negative pressure to get the fluid to rise in the pores above a hydrostatic column. I felt that there were some other more likely explanations, such as peristaltic pumping of the pore fluid by the walls of the pores (so that the system is not hydrostatic) or viscoelasticity of the pore fluid (beyond the "tensile strength" of water; actually tensile stiffness). Has anyone ever measured the rheological (viscoelastic) characteristics of the (biological) pore fluid in the laboratory? (Biological fluids are notoriously viscoelastic)

In any event, our excursion into the esoteric subject of the possible existence of negative absolute pressure has gone far afield of the intent of the OP's original questions. Irrespective of whether negative absolute pressure can actually exist, the formation of bubbles and the occurrence of cavitation are realities that we have adequately explained in our previous responses.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
17K
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K