Vaporization and Energy absorption

AI Thread Summary
In modern nanotechnologies, metals can be vaporized to create a thin, hard protective layer on surfaces. The discussion centers on calculating the energy required to heat 0.55 kg of iron from 1400°C to vapor at 2050°C. The final energy calculation yields 3,766,950 J. Participants confirm this result, indicating agreement on the calculation. This energy requirement is crucial for applications in nanotechnology.
Zoey Brown
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
In modern nanotechnologies, metals can be vapourized to coat onto the surface of another

material as a thin but hard protective layer. How much energy would it take to heat 0.55

kg of iron from 1400oC to vapour at 2050oC?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
HEY ZOEY,

Did you get 3 766 950 J as a final answer?
 
HEY FIZZIX,
i did as a matter of fact, thanks for confirming good sir.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top