Variation Distance: Explaining Finite Cases

  • Thread starter Thread starter boboYO
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variation
boboYO
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
I was doing some reading and I came across this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_variation_distance_of_probability_measures

So apparently for the finite case,

\max_{x} ( \left| P(x) - Q(x) \right|)\quad \mbox{ is equivalent to}\quad \frac{1}{2} \sum_x {\left| P(x)-Q(x)\right|}


but isn't this is a counterexample?
Code:
x         1        2        3        4
P(x)    0.25     0.25     0.25      0.25

Q(x)    0.10     0.20     0.35      0.35

|P-Q|   0.15     0.05     0.10      0.10

sum(|P-Q|)/2= 0.2

max(|P-Q|)=0.15



So I was thinking, maybe they meant 'equivalent' in a different sense? Could somebody please explain?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I believe they might mean that those two metrics define the same topology on the set of probability measures.
 
Rochfor1 is correct. "Equivalent" simply means that they will give the same results in any probability measures, not that they are equal.
 
Thanks guys.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top