Variation method (Quantum Mech.)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around using the variational method to approximate the ground-state wave function for a quantum particle in a potential energy function V(x) = C|x|^3. The user presents their calculations for the expectation values of kinetic and potential energy, ultimately leading to a Hamiltonian expression. They express concern over the complexity of the resulting expression after minimizing the Hamiltonian and seek feedback on potential mistakes. The thread emphasizes the importance of independent work while allowing for discussion of problems, with a note that the lecturer is open to questions. The conversation concludes with a reminder of the forum's policy against providing direct homework solutions.
T-7
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Here's the problem:

Homework Statement



Quantum particle moving in 1D. Potential energy function is V(x) = C|x|^{3}. Using the variational method, find an approx. ground-state wave function for the particle.

The Attempt at a Solution



Using \psi = Ae^{-ax^{2}}, I find that

A = \left(\frac{2a}{\pi}\right)^{1/4}

Then,

<H> = <T> + <V> = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^{2}}{dx^{2}}+C|x^{3}|

<T> = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}A^{2}\left( -2a\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}e^{-2ax^{2}} dx + 4a^{2}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}x^{2}e^{-2ax^{2}} dx \right)

which I work out to be

<T> = \frac{\hbar^{2}a}{2m}

For the potential energy component, I state that

<V> = CA^{2}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{-ax^{2}} |x|^{3} e^{-ax^{2}} dx = 2CA^{2} \int_{0}^{+\infty} x^{3}e^{-2ax^{2}} dx

which I find to be

<V> = \frac{CA^{2}}{4a^{2}} = ... = \frac{C}{2a\sqrt{2a\pi}}

And thus

<H> = \frac{\hbar^{2}a}{2m} + \frac{C}{2a\sqrt{2a\pi}}

Minimising (diff. H wrt. a and set to zero) I obtain

\left(\frac{3Cm}{2\hbar^{2}\sqrt{2\pi}}\right)^{2/5},

but this (substituted back into the expression for <H> above) produces a rather ugly looking expression, which makes me suspicious that I have made a mistake somewhere down the line.

Can anyone see where (or if) I am going wrong?

Cheers!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Dr Hooley intended you to do the assessed work on your own. ;)
 
Anony-mouse said:
Dr Hooley intended you to do the assessed work on your own. ;)

Whilst we are intended to work through the exercises ourselves, as far as I know we're encouraged to discuss all the problems, and the lecturer has been willing to take questions himself on any of the set problems. I've not reproduced my working in detail here for anyone to copy, nor am I asking for detailed working in reply. It's against this forum's policy to do your homework for you.

However, if you're under the impression that 'starred' Qs can't be discussed at all, I'll ask my tutor for clarification. Consider the thread closed.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top