Variation of cosmological constant with time

kalish
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Hello, in the paper from sean carroll "the cosmological constant" we can read this:
In the Weinberg-Salam electroweak model, the phases of broken
and unbroken symmetry are distinguished by a potential energy difference of approximately
MEW ∼ 200 GeV (where 1 GeV = 1.6 × 10−3 erg); the universe is in the broken-symmetry
phase during our current low-temperature epoch, and is believed to have been in the symmet-
ric phase at sufficiently high temperatures in the early universe. The effective cosmological
constant is therefore different in the two epochs; absent some form of prearrangement, we
would naturally expect a contribution to the vacuum energy today of order

Does this variation of the cosmological constant after symetry breaking is considered as real and accepted in standard cosmology? I find very few talks about a varying cosmological constant, and it is about border line theories. Is it set at the value actually observed in the whole evolution of the universe?

Best.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you want us to discuss the paper, please give us a journal reference, or preferably a URL on arxiv.org.
 
This is it. I happened to be looking for a variable cosmological 'constant' myself.

http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0004075

I think Carrolls views on this are mainstream, or at least not too near the left bank.
 
I think this is also mainstream cause I read it in other papers, but I didn't find a discussion about the cosmological implication. This is kind of weird, If the current cosmological constant is really tiny, then how a tiny constant less a big contribution can not be negative and affect the cosmological models??
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top