Variation of Laplace-Beltrami wrt metric tensor

Päällikkö
Homework Helper
Messages
516
Reaction score
11
I have a very limited knowledge of tensor calculus, and I've never had proper exposure to general relativity, but I hope that the people reading this forum are able to help out.

So I'm doing some stat. mech. and a part of a system's free energy is
\mathcal{F} = \int V(\rho)\nabla^2\rho dx
I'd like to derive the stress/pressure tensor. According to a reference, taking linear combinations of all symmetric tensors s.t. the equilibrium condition is satisfied (div P = 0), I should get the form
P_{\alpha\beta} = ((\mu \rho - f) + (\nabla V(\rho))\cdot (\nabla\rho) + V(\rho)\nabla^2\rho)\delta_{\alpha\beta} - \partial_\alpha V(\rho)\partial_\beta\rho - \partial_\alpha \rho\partial_\beta V(\rho)
where \mu = \frac{\delta\mathcal{F}}{\delta \rho}, f = V(\rho)\nabla^2\rho
Ok, I thought, I want to test out a rather obscure reference from 30 years ago, where a form for the pressure tensor was derived as
\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{g}P_{\alpha\beta} = \frac{\delta \mathcal{F}}{\delta g^{\alpha\beta}}
So writing the free energy in generalized coordinates, I suppose I'd get something like
\mathcal{F} = \int \sqrt{g}V(\rho) \frac{1}{\sqrt{g}} \partial_i(\sqrt{g}g^{ij}\rho_{,j}) dx
Taking the variation, I'm led to believe that I get EDIT: I believe this is wrong, as the variation depends on derivatives of gij as well. Using this fact and the Cristoffel symbols, for the final operator, I think I might get somewhere
P_{\alpha\beta} = (\mu \rho - f)g_{\alpha\beta} + 2\frac{\partial f}{\partial g^{\alpha\beta}}
where f = V(\rho) \frac{1}{\sqrt{g}} \partial_i(\sqrt{g}g^{ij}\rho_{,j})

This means I should take the derivative of the Laplace-Beltrami operator wrt the metric tensor. I tried using different identities for the derivatives of √g, but couldn't get where I wanted to. Any help would be greatly appreciated. I'm a bit worried that the derivatives on V might not appear on the final form, as they do in the reference (derived through a different route).
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top