Variation of system energy in Canonical Ensemble

AI Thread Summary
In a canonical ensemble, a system in contact with a reservoir at a fixed temperature can exchange energy, leading to variations in system energy despite the macrostate being defined by (N,V,T). The internal energy is indeed a function of temperature and volume, but the ensemble average allows for multiple microstates with different energies to coexist under the same macroscopic conditions. The confusion arises from equating the thermodynamic internal energy of a single system with the ensemble average. Energy fluctuations are statistically significant, especially in large systems, where the standard deviation of energy fluctuations decreases as the number of particles increases. Understanding these concepts clarifies how energy exchange and statistical fluctuations operate within the canonical ensemble framework.
devd
Messages
47
Reaction score
1
A system is in contact with a reservoir at a specific temperature. The macrostate of the system is specified by the triple (N,V,T) viz., particle number, volume and temperature.

The canonical ensemble can be used to analyze the situation. In the canonical ensemble, the system can exchange energy with the reservoir, with the system energy varying, in principle, from zero to infinity.

I don't understand how the system energy can vary once we specify (N,V,T). The internal energy, after all, can be considered to be a function of T and V, U=U(T,V).

Surely, we're not talking about the fluctuation, i.e. the standard deviation in energy, since that is very small for systems with large N. Where am I going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The ##\underline{\text{expected value}}## of the internal energy ##<U>## is the (macroscopical) quantity that depends of ##N##,##T##.
 
  • Like
Likes devd
In order to find the density matrix, you have to minimize the Gibb's entropy: $$S= -k_B Tr(\hat \rho ln \hat \rho)$$
With the constraints: $$Tr(\hat \rho)=1$$ and $$ <U>=Tr(\hat \rho \hat H) =E= constant$$
i.e, you let your system explore all the microstates (which include microstates with different energy) that are compatible with the macroscopic constraint ##<U>=E=constant##
 
  • Like
Likes devd
Yes, i think i get where i was going wrong. I was equating the thermodynamic notion of internal energy to the internal energy of one individual system, instead of the ensemble average. Thanks for the reply.

Just to be clear, there are multiple microstates with different U which correspond to the same macrostate defined by (N,V,T), right?
Also, this exchange of energy between the system and reservoir is basically due to statistical fluctuation, which i was ignoring?
 
Exactly.
Moreover, you can prove that, if we define ##\delta U = \frac{<U>-U}{U}## then the standard deviation of ##\delta U## (the relative fluctuations) decay as:
$$ <(\delta U)^{2}> \sim \frac{1}{N}$$
 
  • Like
Likes devd
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'

Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'

Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
View full post »

Thread 'Do electron density waves accompany EM waves in coaxial cables?'

Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
View full post »
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'

Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'

The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
View full post »

Similar threads

I How Can Internal Energy of the Canonical Ensemble Change (Fluctuate)?
Replies
15
Views
2K
I Concept of Thermal Equilibrium in the Context of Canonical Ensemble
Replies
5
Views
3K
Free energy changes in a canonical ensemble
Replies
14
Views
2K
I Derivation of the Canonical Ensemble
Replies
3
Views
2K
Microcanonical vs canonical vs grand canonical ensemble
Replies
1
Views
37K
Microcanonical ensemble question
Replies
3
Views
2K
How can energy vary in the canonical ensemble
Replies
11
Views
2K
I Connecting the microcanonical with the (grand) canonical ensemble
Replies
37
Views
5K
A Number of particles in canonical ensemble
Replies
9
Views
2K
Pressure in canonical ensemble
Replies
5
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top