Variational Calculus: Euler-Lagrange vs. Lagrange's Equation of Motion

babtridge
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Could someone please direct me to a good web page or comment on the main difference between the euler lagrange eqn and lagranges eqn of motion. I'm struggling to differentiate between the two...
Also, I'm struggling to grasp the concept of Lagrange density - when does one introduce this into the action integral? :confused:

Cheers
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well,technically,they are the same bunch of equations.The names are confusing.It would be fair,if the general ones,which don't have anything to do with physics,Lagrangians and lagrangian actions be called :"Euler's equations".

And the ones who do have everything to do with physics:"Lagrange's equations".

Daniel.

P.S.The Lagrangian density is the volumic density of lagrangian.Thay appear once people introduce the concept of (classical) field.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top