Variational calculus or fluid dynamics for fluid rotating in a cup

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the appropriate mathematical approach to describe the surface of a rotating liquid in a cylindrical cup. The problem is framed around a cup of coffee being stirred, seeking to define the surface equation S(r,h) based on rotation and density. Participants clarify that this is primarily a fluid dynamics problem rather than a variational calculus issue. Key considerations include the forces acting on the fluid, such as gravity and centrifugal forces, which influence the surface shape. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of fluid dynamics in this context.
LawrenceJB
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
my first post having just joined!
Problem statement - what curve describes the surface of a rotating liquid? Stirring my cup of coffee years ago sparked this thought.
Question - is the way to solve this problem to use variational calculus, or fluid dynamics? I have always thought the former but recently someone suggested to me that it's the latter.
Any thoughts greatly appreciated.
Lawrence
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have a specific, precisely stated, problem in mind?
 
Hi. Here's my problem, stated with more detail.
Imagine a cylindrical cup of coffee, being stirred and where the surface of the stirred coffee has reached some steady state. In terms of the rate of rotation of the liquid and its density, define the equation of the surface of the rotating liquid S(r,h), where r is the distance of a point on the surface of the rotating liquid from the centre of rotation and h is its height above the lowest point on the surface of the rotating liquid. Ignore friction effects of the sides and bottom of the cup which has height H and radius R. The cup is half full of coffee before being stirred.

Hope that about does it. I'd like to know if this is a variational calculus problem or a fluid dynamics problem.

Thanks
 
Is this a homework problem? If so, please post in the homework section next time.

Some hint: In hydrostatics the equation for the pressure reads
$$\vec{\nabla} p=\vec{F},$$
where ##\vec{F}## is the force per volume. At the surface of the fluid you have ##p=0##, where ##p## is measured relative to the atmospheric pressure. Now you have just to specify the forces (gravity and centrifugal forces in the rotating reference frame) to get the equation of the surface. It's not too difficult!

The variational principle for ideal-fluid mechanics can be found in

A. Sommerfeld, Lectures on theoretical physics, vol. 2.
 
Thanks for the response. It's not a homework question - just a problem I thought was interesting.

Let me digest what you've suggested and I'll get back with some clarification questions.
 
LawrenceJB said:
Hi. Here's my problem, stated with more detail.
Imagine a cylindrical cup of coffee, being stirred and where the surface of the stirred coffee has reached some steady state. In terms of the rate of rotation of the liquid and its density, define the equation of the surface of the rotating liquid S(r,h), where r is the distance of a point on the surface of the rotating liquid from the centre of rotation and h is its height above the lowest point on the surface of the rotating liquid. Ignore friction effects of the sides and bottom of the cup which has height H and radius R. The cup is half full of coffee before being stirred.

Hope that about does it. I'd like to know if this is a variational calculus problem or a fluid dynamics problem.

Thanks
It's a fluid dynamics problem, and involves much more than just hydrostatics.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top