Variational Principles in GR: Explaining Lagrangian Varying

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pleasehelpmeno
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gr
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of variational principles in General Relativity (GR), specifically focusing on the process of varying a Lagrangian to derive equations of motion. Participants explore the notation and mathematical expressions involved in this process, addressing potential misunderstandings and clarifications related to covariant derivatives and the structure of the action integral.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the equality of two expressions derived from varying a Lagrangian, specifically regarding the treatment of indices and the role of covariant derivatives.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on the notation used, suggesting that the presence of \mathcal{L} may be incorrect and questioning the meaning of the derivatives involved.
  • A subsequent reply corrects the notation error regarding \mathcal{L} and provides the full action integral, indicating that the derivatives are covariant.
  • One participant suggests starting with Minkowski spacetime to simplify the problem before tackling the covariant case, implying that this approach may aid in understanding the notation and calculations.
  • Another participant explains the process of taking derivatives in the context of the Lagrangian, emphasizing the quadratic nature of the expression and the resulting factors from differentiation.
  • A final note references the covariant Klein-Gordon action, suggesting that the final answer should align with established formulations found in literature.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of understanding regarding the notation and mathematical steps involved in the variational process. There is no clear consensus on the correct interpretation of the expressions or the best approach to resolve the initial confusion.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential misunderstandings of notation, the dependence on the definitions of covariant derivatives, and the complexity introduced by the \sqrt{-g} factor in the context of GR. Some mathematical steps remain unresolved or unclear.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those studying General Relativity and variational principles in field theory.

pleasehelpmeno
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
Hi
Can anyone explain why from varying a Lagrangian?
[itex]\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_{\alpha }\phi)}(\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{-g}g^{\alpha\beta}\partial_{\alpha} \phi \partial_{\beta} \phi) = g^{\mu\nu}\partial_{\mu}\partial_{\nu}\phi + \frac{1}{\sqrt{-g}}(\partial_{\nu}\phi)\partial_{\mu}(g^{\alpha \beta}\sqrt{-g})[/itex]

I realize that the indices are dummies and so can be renamed accordingly but I don't understand why it isn't equal to:

[itex](\frac{1}{2}g^{\mu\nu} \partial_{\nu} \phi) + \frac{1}{\sqrt{-g}}(\partial_{\mu} \phi) \partial_{\mu}(\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{-g}g^{\mu\nu} \partial_{\nu} \phi)<br /> [/itex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pleasehelpmeno said:
[itex]\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_{\alpha }\phi)}(\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{-g}g^{\alpha\beta}\partial_{\alpha} \phi \partial_{\beta} \phi)[/itex]

I don't understand your notation in the above expression. Should the [itex]\mathcal{L}[/itex] not be there? Isn't the expression in parens what [itex]\mathcal{L}[/itex] is? On the r.h.s. of the first equations, the beta doesn't make sense, because there are no other betas unbound anywhere else. Is [itex]\partial[/itex] a covariant derivative, or a plain partial derivative?

Is this copied from messy lecture notes that you're having trouble reconstructing?
 
yeah sorry the [itex]\mathcal{L}[/itex] was a mistake and should not be there, the action in full is:

[itex]S= \int \sqrt{-g} [\frac{1}{2}g^{\alpha \beta}(\partial_{\alpha}\phi)(\partial_{\beta}\phi)-\frac{1}{2}m^{2}\phi^{2}] d^{4}X[/itex]

The [itex](\partial_{\alpha}\phi)[/itex] is a covariant derivative i think. It's just trying to find the:
[itex]\frac{\partial \mathcal{l}}{(\partial_{\alpha}\phi)}[/itex] term in the E-L equations but i am having trouble with the GR notation.
 
Try doing it in Minkowski spacetime first, so that you don't have to worry about the [itex]\sqrt{-g}[/itex] factor (it's just 1 in Special Relativity). After you've worked it out in flat spacetime, you'll probably find it easier to do it in the covariant case because you'll have experience with how to take derivatives of certain quantities.
 
When you calculate (∂/∂φ)(½gαβφφ), the independent variable is φ. So it's like you're calculating (∂/∂x)(½Cxx). You apply the derivative to each φ in turn - it's like a quadratic. You'll get a factor of two from that, and what's left is just gαβφ.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K