MHB Vector algebra- centroid of tetrahedron

mathisfun1
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
How to find out the position vector of the centroid of tetrahedron , the position vectors of whose vertices are a,b,c,d respectively.
I am familiar with the result, namely a+b+c+d/4 but want to know how to derive it without using the 3:1 ratio property.
Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which definition of centroid are you using? According to Wikipedia, "the centroid of a plane figure or two-dimensional shape is the arithmetic mean ("average") position of all the points in the shape", so the fact that the position vector of the centroid is $(a+b+c+d)/4$ holds by definition in that case.
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
Which definition of centroid are you using? According to Wikipedia, "the centroid of a plane figure or two-dimensional shape is the arithmetic mean ("average") position of all the points in the shape", so the fact that the position vector of the centroid is $(a+b+c+d)/4$ holds by definition in that case.

The centroid of a tetrahedron is the intersection of all line segments that connect each vertex to the centroid of the opposite face.
 
mathisfun said:
The centroid of a tetrahedron is the intersection of all line segments that connect each vertex to the centroid of the opposite face.
Not the easiest definition to work with, but OK. I assume then that the centroid of a triangle is the intersection of its medians. I prefer to work from weighted points and prove that the center of mass, or barycenter, is the intersection of medians.

A weighted point is an ordered pair $(A,x)$ where $A$ is a point and $x$ is a real number. The barycenter of a set $\{(A_1,x_1),\dots,(A_n,x_n)\}$ of weighted points is a point $A$ such that
\[
\overrightarrow{OA}=\frac{1}{S}\left(x_1\overrightarrow{OA}_1+\dots+x_n\overrightarrow{OA}_n\right)
\]
where $S=x_1+\dots+x_n$ and $O$ is any point. One can show that the resulting point $A$ does not depend on the choice of $O$. Another property is that the barycenter of two points lies on the line passing through these points.

According to this definition, the barycenter of $\{(A,1),(B,1),(C,1)\}$ is a point $M$ such that
\[
\overrightarrow{OM}=\frac{1}{3}\left(\overrightarrow{OA}+\overrightarrow{OB}+\overrightarrow{OC}\right).
\]
But the right-hand side equals
\[
\frac{1}{3}\left(\overrightarrow{OA}+2\frac{1}{2}\left(\overrightarrow{OB}+\overrightarrow{OC}\right)\right).
\]
Thus, $M$ is the barycenter of $(A,1)$ and $(A',2)$ where $A'$ is the barycenter of $(B,1)$ and $(C,1)$, i.e., the center of $BC$. Therefore, $M$ lies on the median $AA'$. Similarly, $A$ lies on the other two medians, so it is the centroid of $\triangle ABC$ according to your definition.

The barycenter of a tetrahedron $ABCD$ is a point $N$ such that
\[
\overrightarrow{ON}=\frac{1}{4}\left(\overrightarrow{OA}+\overrightarrow{OB}+\overrightarrow{OC}+\overrightarrow{OD}\right).
\]
But the right-hand side equals
\[
\frac{1}{4}\left(\overrightarrow{OA}+3\frac{1}{3}\left(\overrightarrow{OB}+\overrightarrow{OC}+\overrightarrow{OD}\right)\right)
\]
Thus, $N$ is the barycenter of $(A,1)$ and $(A',3)$ where $A'$ is the barycenter and the centroid of $(B,1)$, $(C,1)$ and $(D,1)$. Therefore, $N$ lies on $AA'$. Similarly, $A$ lies on the other three segments connecting vertices to the centroids of the opposite faces, so it is the centroid of the tetrahedron $ABCD$ according to your definition.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
452
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top