Vector Definition: Magnitude & Direction Effects

  • Thread starter Thread starter hokhani
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition Vector
AI Thread Summary
Vectors cannot be solely defined as quantities with magnitude and direction because their mathematical definition is independent of coordinate systems. They are elements of a vector space, emphasizing their nature as geometrical objects rather than mere numerical arrays. The behavior of vector components under coordinate transformations, such as rotations, highlights their intrinsic properties. This perspective reinforces that vectors exist beyond the choice of any specific coordinate system. Understanding vectors in this way allows for a more robust and universal application in mathematics and physics.
hokhani
Messages
555
Reaction score
16
Why we can not define a vector as a quantity which has magnitude and direction? Why we define the vectors according to behavior of its components in rotated coordinate-frames?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Vectors are, by definition, the elements of a vector space. In my opinion, other definitions are corollaries in disguise.
 
Vectors and tensors in general are mathematically defined independent of coordinate systems. This emphasizes the fact that they are geometrical objects which don't care about your preference for a certain coordinate system. If you regard a vector via its components as an array {a,b,...} which you can assign a length to, it looks like vectors cannot exist without the choice of coordinates.

From the coordinate-free definition it follows that the components (!) have a certain behaviour under coordinate transformations, like the rotations you mentioned.
 
  • Like
Likes hokhani
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top