Vector identity involving grad and a function

ck99
Messages
56
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The question is to use index notation to show that the following is true, where a is a three-vector and f is some function.

Homework Equations



vector_thing.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution



Hmmmm . . . I haven't really got anything to put here!

I am starting to get to grips with the basics of index notation, and using the Levi-Civitas identities for other identity proofs. I haven't ever worked with grad before though, and I can't find any help online because I can't find any other identities that look like this one. Does it have a name or something to help me search?

The closest I have found is "The product of a vector and a scalar" on wikipedia

scalar_and_vector.jpg


but my question states that f is a function, not a scalar, which must make some difference I guess! I just don't know where to start here, do any of the operations within my question have an index-notation version using the LC tensor or similar?

Any help much appreciated :)


PS: You will need to click the thumbnails in the post to see the full pictures of the equations. I am not much of a computer guy. Or a maths guy, it seems :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
f is a scalar function, as opposed to, say, a vector function.

The i-th component of \nabla f is \partial_if. Use that and the Levi-Civita symbol to prove the identity.
 
vela said:
f is a scalar function, as opposed to, say, a vector function.

The i-th component of \nabla f is \partial_if. Use that and the Levi-Civita symbol to prove the identity.

I think the root of my problem here is that I have no idea how to write out the starting equation in ordinary longhand notation (as components of vectors), let alone in index notation.

Is \nabla f equal to f \nabla?

And what do I get from multiplying \nabla with fa?
 
If you don't understand the notation or what the gradient is, a good place to start is looking up what it means.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gradient

Your textbooks will probably have a more accessible discussion.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top