Vector Properties: Does Length Affect Components?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nuuskur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Properties Vector
nuuskur
Science Advisor
Messages
920
Reaction score
1,221
Is there something said about \lim_{||v||\to 0} \frac{v_i}{||v||}? Is it correct to assume if the length of a vector approaches 0, then any component of that vector has to approach 0, aswell?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would say yes... check out the proof I did... which I think works.. and similarily with substituting into y.
 

Attachments

  • Proof.png
    Proof.png
    28.6 KB · Views: 430
  • Like
Likes nuuskur
DannyMoretz said:
I would say yes... check out the proof I did... which I think works.. and similarily with substituting into y.
It is against the rules at PF to give answers like that. You should've asked the OP to calculate the limits himself/herself.
 
I didn't post this in a homeworks' section and it isn't one, either. I was merely curious and couldn't find relevant info on it myself, since my English is bad.
 
nuuskur said:
I didn't post this in a homeworks' section and it isn't one, either. I was merely curious and couldn't find relevant info on it myself, since my English is bad.
Sorry, I didn't pay attention to the section. But I wanted to mention it to Danny, who is new here. It would still have been better to start by pointing you in the right direction.
 

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Thread 'Fermat's Last Theorem'

Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
View full post »
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'

Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'

I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Is a vector itself contra/covariant or just its components?
Replies
22
Views
3K
B Why Do We Draw Dimensionless Unit Vectors in Diagrams?
Replies
16
Views
4K
I Solving simultaneous vector equations
Replies
11
Views
3K
Morin 3.7 -- Block sliding sideways on an inclined plane
Replies
11
Views
1K
How Are Dual Vector Components Determined by Basis Vectors?
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Prove $$T_{p}M$$ is a vector space with the axioms
Replies
3
Views
2K
I What does a complex vector "look" like?
Replies
13
Views
4K
I How deep does it need to go for a physics theory to be consistent?
2
Replies
50
Views
3K
A Contravariance, Covariance, stress and position vector
Replies
24
Views
2K
Can A Vector Have Components Of Say Y or Z in the X-Hat Direction?
Replies
8
Views
859

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top