Velocities of earth's atmosphere, exosphere etc

  • Thread starter Thread starter luckis11
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atmosphere
AI Thread Summary
Earth's atmosphere at sea level moves at the same velocity as the solid surface, approximately 465 meters per second. At higher altitudes, such as the exosphere, particle velocities vary significantly due to factors like atmospheric density and solar activity. The upper atmosphere experiences turbulence due to temperature differences between day and night, leading to chaotic air movement. This turbulence complicates weather predictions, as meteorologists must account for these dynamic interactions. Understanding these velocities and their variations is crucial for comprehending atmospheric behavior and its impact on weather patterns.
luckis11
Messages
272
Reaction score
2
Earth's atmosphere at sea level has the same velocity as Earth's solid surface: 465metres/sec. What about at higher heights? E.g. what's the velocity of the (particles of) exosphere?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I have to get ready for a meeting, so this will be a bit brief. I'll give you some search terms. Try these, and come back with some more specific questions.
  • Diurnal bulge
  • Atmospheric tides
  • Neutral wind velocity
  • Upper atmosphere wind velocity
  • Upper atmosphere density variations
  • Effect of solar activity on the upper atmosphere
 
The question was full lucid and specific: The motion Δx of the speed 465meteres/sec of the air is that which is drawn on the reference frame which does not move together with the self-rotating motion of the earth. Thus I asked the velocities the Δx of which are drawn on that reference frame.
 
Earth's upper atmosphere is extremely turbulent, partly because it is less dense and partly because the sun has a night and day effect. The cooler night air tries to descend against the rising air currents on the dayside - and clouds stir the mix. It is quite chaotic and having meteoroligists trying to explain the effects on local weather day by day further compounds matters.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top