Velocity and Mass to Acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenge of graphing an equation that involves velocity, mass, and acceleration, specifically using the equation for relativistic mass. The user is trying to express their equation in terms of acceleration but is limited by software that only graphs two variables. Suggestions include using a parameterized approach with velocity as a variable and adjusting mass accordingly. Additionally, the complexities of relativistic physics are highlighted, particularly how mass increases as velocity approaches the speed of light, complicating the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration. For better graphing capabilities, exploring more advanced software or utilizing a physics-focused forum is recommended.
Zales
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am graphing an equation, but my software will not graph more than two variables. I have velocity (v) and velocity dependent mass (m sub 0), but I need to write it in terms of x, which I have as acceleration. This problem stems from me plugging in the following equation for the relationship between speed and mass: (m sub 0)/sqrt(1-((v/c)^2). If it is even possible to do it another way, please let me know. Or if it's not possible and I need better software, please let me know is that is the case also.

Thank you,
Zales

PS. This post is very poorly worded. Here is a link to a much better formatted equation, and if you wish for me to clarify anything, please let me know.
http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/Images/ae388c.gif
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You'll have a much more clear picture of what's happening if you choose your variable to be v, and set c=3x108 and m0 to be a parameter that you change to whatever you like. Better yet would be to choose your variable to be v/c which means to set c=1 and then v will be represented by a percentage of c. So at x=0.5 on the graph, that means that v will be half of the speed of light.
 
Sorry, maybe I should have added more information. What I'm trying to graph is F=Ma, with 'F' as y, 'M' as the slope, and 'a' as 'x'. In slope intercept form, I had F=Ma+0. The equation is equivalent to 'M', so the equation was plugged in for 'M'. I have 'c' as 2.998x10^8. My full equation, so far, is y=(m/(sqrt(1-(v/(2.998*10^8))^2)))x+0.

PS. How did you input your subscripts and superscripts?
 
You may want to head over to the physics section of the forum as well to get a better idea of what your equations should actually be, because relativistic mass increases in a stationary reference frame as v approaches c, so it's not quite as simple as that. In 1 dimension (to keep things simple for the moment) your equation would be

F=\gamma ^3m_0a

where a is simply the change in velocity over time, a=\frac{dv}{dt} and \gamma is the lorentz factor \gamma=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}}

It gets more complicated in 3 dimensions though. You'll have situations where the particle won't accelerate in the direction you applied the force, which is very counter-intuitive with respect to Newtonian mechanics.

I'm sure you'll get more informed answers in the physics section though.

Anyway, back to your question. You can still graph it on a 2d plane, but you'll have v as a parameter that you can adjust accordingly. What I mean by this is if you think about graphing y=x and y=2x on the same plane to compare their differences, you can do the same except you'll choose v=0.1, v=0.5, v=0.9 etc. and compare those.

The superscripts are the x2 button that's above the message you're sending. Or you can learn all about LaTeX to get real fancy :wink:
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top