Velocity dependent forces problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter retupmoc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Velocity
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the force exerted when a ball hits a wall at speed V, one can use the change of momentum and the time of contact. The time-averaged force can be determined by dividing the change in momentum by the contact time, as force is defined as the rate of change of momentum (dp/dt). However, in high-speed collisions, the contact time is very brief, leading to a practically infinite force due to the rapid change in momentum. This scenario is often analyzed through the concept of impulse, which is the product of force and time, equating to the change in momentum. Understanding collision theory and impact analysis is crucial for accurately assessing these dynamics.
retupmoc
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
I know of velocity dependent forces and the like but have a problem in grasping a problem I've been thinking over for the past few days although i know the answer is really simple. For exampe when a ball hits a wall at speed V, say how do i work out the force. Is it just by using the change of momentum and time of contact?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The time-averaged force acting upon the ball can be found in the manner you described.
Notice that this force will be practically infinite, since the contact time is practically zero!

What do you know of collision theory/impact analysis?
 
When collisions happen very quickly we tend to talk of an impulse. Defined as a force multiplied by a time, an impulse is equal to the change of momentum (simply N2 rearranged).

If however you know the change of momentum and the time of contact you can work out the force, as force is dp/dt so just divide the two and you have the force.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top