Velocity distribution of evaporating water molecules

AI Thread Summary
The velocity distribution of evaporating water molecules is not Maxwellian due to the nature of the evaporation process. Evaporation involves complex interactions that are not purely elastic, challenging the assumption of a Maxwellian distribution. The discussion references several academic sources that explore specific aspects of this topic. It raises fundamental questions about the interactions involved in evaporation and whether they can be classified as two-particle interactions. Overall, the evaporation of H2O molecules requires a reevaluation of traditional kinetic theory models.
Kazys
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
What is the velocity distribution of evaporating H2O molecules? It can not be Maxwellian.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thank you for the references. They deal with rather specific issues of this general question. I would like to
reframe it in more simple terms. A Maxwellian distribution results when freely moving particles interact
elastically. The question can be posed as follows - is the evaporation of an H2O molecule elastic?
Is it a two particle interaction? If not, can the distribution of evaporating molecules be Maxwellian?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top