How are the energy and speed distributions of classical particles related?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between energy and speed distributions of classical particles, specifically how to derive the speed distribution from the energy distribution. It begins with the equation n(E) dE = A(E^0.5) dE, which describes the number of particles within a specific energy range. By substituting dE with mv dv, the relationship leads to the conclusion that N(v)dv = A ((m^3)/2)^0.5 (v^2)dv, establishing a connection between energy and speed distributions. The discussion emphasizes the necessity of recognizing that the number of particles in energy and speed ranges must be equal when the variables are appropriately linked. Understanding this transformation is crucial for analyzing classical particle distributions.
sachi
Messages
63
Reaction score
1
We are given that
n(E) dE = A(E^0.5) dE
gives us the no. of particles between E and E+dE, where E is the energy of a particle and A is a constant. We are told to model the particles as classical particles i.e E=0.5m(v^2)
We need to find the speed distribution. This is of the form N(v)dV, where N is a function of v. We were given a solution that says substitute dE = mv dv into our first eq'n and we get A (E^0.5) mv dv = A ((m^3)/2)^0.5) (v^2)dv. Therefore we conclude that N(v)dv = A ((m^3)/2)^0.5) (v^2)dv. This means that we initially have to assume that n(E)dE = N(v)dv , and I am not sure about the logic of this. There must be some physical principle about why the distribution of particles with respect to one variable can be transformed into another.

Thanks v. much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know how many particles have energy between E and E + dE, and you want to find how many particles have speed between v and v + dv. But you also know that the range (v,v+dv) of speeds corresponds to a certain range (E,E+dE) of energies, right? In this case you would have E = mv^2/2 and dE= m v dv. What does this say? It says that all the particles with speed (v,v+dv) also have energy (E,E+dE) provided we identify E and dE as I did above. Now write this statement in mathematical language: "number of particles with energy in (E,E+dE)" = n(E)dE, and "number of particles with speed in (v,v+dv)" = N(v)dv. Both of these are definitions, and the connection between them comes when you realize that these two numbers should be equal if E and dE are connected to v and dv as above.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top