Velocity emparted to a mass by the decompression of a spring

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the velocity of a 3-kilogram mass propelled by a spring that decompresses over 1/20 of a second. A formula provided, V=(2F*t2)/3.14M, raises concerns about its logical consistency, particularly regarding how the decompression time affects velocity. Participants suggest that the formula may stem from mass-spring oscillator analysis, but its behavior seems counterintuitive. An alternative approach using conservation of energy is recommended, focusing on the energy transfer rather than the time factor. This method may yield a more intuitive understanding of the mass's velocity at the moment the spring fully decompresses.
NTL01
Messages
21
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


A 1.5 inch spring is .75 inches at solid length when fully compressed. The spring force is rated at 400 lbs per inch. A 3 kilogram mass will be pushed by the spring. What is the velocity of the mass at the instant the spring has fully decompressed. It will take the spring 1/20 of a second to decompress

2. Relevant equation

An equation was offered to me by a tutor as follows

V=(2F*t2)/3.14M

Where F is the force of the spring in Newtons, T2 is the time it takes for the spring to decompress , M is the mass being pushed

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't have any trouble solving this equation because I have all the variables. What troubles me is I don't think it makes intuitive sense because of the T2 term. The slower the spring decompresses the more the velocity goes up, which just doesn't seem logical

I am seeking comments , and possibly an alternative formula.

The formula above was derived by use of hooks law and the F=MA resolved into a differential equation, and I can't follow the derivation well enough to see if there was a mistake
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't recognize the given formula, and as you say it doesn't appear to behave properly. I'm thinking that it may be an effort to use a mass-spring oscillator analysis to determine a velocity at a specific time in the cycle. Otherwise I can't see why there appears to be a pi value in it.

I would suggest that you approach this using conservation of energy and ignore the time.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top