Velocity frame of reference in lorentz force equation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of the velocity in the Lorentz force equation, particularly whether it should be defined relative to the observer or to the system generating the magnetic field. Participants explore implications of different reference frames in the context of electromagnetic theory, including the role of relativity and the behavior of multiple charges and wires.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the velocity in the Lorentz force equation is defined relative to the observer rather than the system generating the magnetic field, suggesting that this could eliminate the need for relativity.
  • Another participant asserts that the velocity must be defined relative to any inertial frame, not just the one where the magnetic field source is at rest, indicating that relativity is necessary.
  • A participant proposes using the velocity difference between the wire and the charge in the Lorentz force law, suggesting that this could yield the same results without invoking relativity.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of using different reference frames, particularly in systems with multiple moving charges or wires, questioning the validity of restricting analysis to a single frame.
  • One participant acknowledges the complexity introduced by multiple wires or charges and reflects on their initial limited perspective regarding a single wire and moving charge.
  • Another participant emphasizes that when changing frames, both the velocity and the electric and magnetic fields must be transformed, highlighting the interconnectedness of these quantities in the Lorentz force law.
  • Several participants agree that the force on a charge can be analyzed from different reference frames, illustrating the flexibility of the Lorentz force equation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriate reference frame for defining velocity in the Lorentz force equation. There is no consensus on whether the velocity should be defined relative to the observer or the system generating the magnetic field, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these choices in complex systems.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the analysis may break down in systems with multiple moving parts, such as generators or motors, and that the transformation of electric and magnetic fields must be considered alongside velocity changes when switching reference frames.

Atheer
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am new here, but there is a question that really bugs me :-(. In Lorentz force why was the velocity defined as relative to the observer and not relative to thesystem generating the magnetic field. By defining it relativ eto the system relativity is not needed to explain how an observer moving with the charge explains the force on the charge.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is relative to any inertial frame. Not just the one where "the system generating the magnetic field" is at rest. That is why relativity is needed.

Btw, there may not be such a frame when the system has moving parts, such as a generator or motor.
 
I mean if we are in the reference of frame of the moving charge, and we use in the lorentz law qVXB the velocity difference between the wire and the charge instead which is V in this case instead of V=0 as is normally done.
 
Your sentence structure is a little confusing, so I am not certain exactly what you are trying to say. However, why should you be forced to use the reference frame where some charge is at rest or the reference frame where some wire is at rest? What if you have a system with two wires or two charges moving with respect to each other? Then your analysis breaks down.

No, the proposal doesn't make sense. Either the principle of relativity holds and you can use Maxwell's equations in any inertial frame, or the principle of relativity does not hold and you can only use Maxwell's equations in one particular reference frame. You cannot have that Maxwell's equations hold only in the frame of wires or only in the frame of charges because then you get scenarios with multiple wires or charges that cannot be analyzed.
 
Last edited:
The link [mentor's note: DaleSpam is referring to a link posted in a previous post which as been removed] reference to aisn't working on my mobile device. I will try again later.

In the meantime, please address my point. How can such a restriction possibly be valid given that some systems will have multiple wires or multiple charges?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Absolutely, i am thinking about your point, which is very interesting, as i limited my thinking to a wire carrying a current with a moving charge beside. Looking from the two frames of reference (the lab reference and the moving charge frame of reference) I noticed that I can get same results defining v as the velocity difference beteen wire and charge without using relativity. I did not think about what will happen if two wires are there and looking again from the two frames of reference and used the way i defined the velocity. :-)
Thanks for your efforts. I read some of your answers on different posts and i thought that was great.
 
Atheer said:
if we are in the reference of frame of the moving charge, and we use in the lorentz law qVXB

The Lorentz force law also includes the electric field: ##F = q \left( E + v \times B \right)##. In the frame of the moving charge, ##v = 0##, but the field is transformed as well so ##E## is nonzero. Whenever you change frames, you have to transform everything, not just velocities.
 
If I am in the lab and i move a dc current carrying wire (a long wire along its axis) near a charge at rest the charge will experience force right?
 
Atheer said:
If I am in the lab and i move a dc current carrying wire (a long wire along its axis) near a charge at rest the charge will experience force right?

Yes. However, you could approach the exact same problem by saying that the wire is at rest and the charge is moving; that's just choosing to use a reference frame in which the speed of the wire is zero and speed of the particle is -v instead of using a reference frame in which the speed of the wire is +v and the speed of the particle is zero. For that matter, you could choose to use a reference frame in which the jet aircraft flying over the lab at 1000 km/hr is at rest; in this frame the speed of the particle is 1000 km/hr and the speed of the wire is 1000 km/hr+v.

In all three of these frames, the force on the particle will be given by ##\vec{F}=q(\vec{E}+\vec{v}\times\vec{B})##, where ##\vec{v}## is the velocity of the particle in that frame (more precisely, the velocity of the particle relative to an observer who is at rest in that frame).
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Nugatory said:
the force on the particle will be given by ##\vec{F}=q(\vec{E}+\vec{v}\times\vec{B})##, where ##\vec{v}## is the velocity of the particle in that frame

And also where ##\vec{E}## and ##\vec{B}## are the electric and magnetic fields in that frame; those fields transform when you change frames just as ##\vec{v}## does.
 
  • #11
PeterDonis said:
And also where ##\vec{E}## and ##\vec{B}## are the electric and magnetic fields in that frame; those fields transform when you change frames just as ##\vec{v}## does.
Yep - that's the answer to the question that I was thinking atheer would be asking next... :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K