Velocity of a galaxy, is it the rotating speed around itself?

AI Thread Summary
The distance to celestial objects is measured from Earth, not from the center of the galaxy, and accuracy decreases with distance. The term "velocity of a galaxy" typically refers to its radial velocity towards or away from Earth, rather than its rotational speed. Brightness is measured in magnitude (MAG), which includes both apparent and absolute values. Clusters do have a center of gravity, but their stability depends on the balance between gravitational forces and the velocities of their stars. Understanding these concepts is essential for beginners in astronomy.
A_I_
Messages
137
Reaction score
0
good day,
well the coming fall I'm entering the astronomy faculty
and i started from now to study the NGC and M objects...
while i was searching for the names and numbers on the web..
i have found several descriptions, which i didn't understand:
1) when they display the distance in LY, is it the distance from the center of the galaxy through the center of ours or what?
2) when they talk about the velocity of a galaxy, is it the rotating speed around itself?
3) when they talk about brightness, the unit used is MAG, can anyone explain the meaning and the use of this parameter?
4) i do know galaxies have centers of gravity, why clusters don't.. if they do have then, they should have also a rotating speed?

i think that's it for now.. :)
it sure is beginner's basic info
but i would appreciate your responses
thanks
Joe
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
A_I_ said:
good day,
well the coming fall I'm entering the astronomy faculty
and i started from now to study the NGC and M objects...
while i was searching for the names and numbers on the web..
i have found several descriptions, which i didn't understand:
1) when they display the distance in LY, is it the distance from the center of the galaxy through the center of ours or what?
2) when they talk about the velocity of a galaxy, is it the rotating speed around itself?
3) when they talk about brightness, the unit used is MAG, can anyone explain the meaning and the use of this parameter?
4) i do know galaxies have centers of gravity, why clusters don't.. if they do have then, they should have also a rotating speed?

i think that's it for now.. :)
it sure is beginner's basic info
but i would appreciate your responses
thanks
Joe
1) The distance is measured from US (Earth) and some closer objects can be very accurate, but the precision drops as distance increases. For M13, as example, it is usually listed at ~22,500 LY. That is from us, not the galactic center. M31 (Andromeda galaxy) used to be listed as ~2.2 million LY, but has been revised to ~2.9 million LY. At that distance, from us or our galaxy center really wouldn't matter.

2) "The velocity of a galaxy" would almost always mean its radial velocity toward or away from us, not its rotation speed.

3) MAG is magnitude. There is "apparent" and "absolute". see: http://www.astronomynotes.com/starprop/s4.htm for both.

4) What kind of clusters? Open clusters or Galactic (globular) clusters? Any associated cluster will have a "center of gravity", it just depends on whether the gravity vs. the velocity of stars is enough to hold the association (cluster) together. Open clusters usually disassociate and Globular clusters usually stay "bound" for billions of years and do rotate as well as revolve around their host galaxy.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top