Velocity of ball rolling down ramp

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a ball of radius ro rolling down the inside of a circular track of radius Ro, starting from rest at the vertical edge. The objective is to determine the speed of the ball at the lowest point of the track while rolling without slipping. The discussion revolves around concepts of energy conservation, potential energy, and the dynamics of rolling motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using conservation of energy to relate initial and final states of the ball, questioning how to define height (h) and the time needed to calculate angular velocity (ω). Some suggest distinguishing between different heights in the problem and applying the condition for rolling without slipping. Others explore the implications of the ball's radius on potential energy calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing hints and guidance on how to approach the problem. There is a recognition of the need to clarify the setup and assumptions, particularly regarding the heights involved and the role of the ball's radius in potential energy. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, and some participants are verifying calculations and assumptions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential issues with the provided diagram and the accuracy of the initial and final height definitions. There is an ongoing examination of how the center of mass of the ball affects potential energy as it rolls down the ramp.

NathanLeduc1
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A ball of radius ro rolls on the inside of a track of radius Ro. If the ball starts from rest at the vertical edge of the track, what will be its speed when it reaches the lowest point of the track, rolling without slipping?

Included below is a link to the diagram:
http://s3.amazonaws.com/answer-board-image/0c73c3d19aaa1d4c316cd2e6d2da8e57.jpg

Homework Equations


v=Roω
Eo=mgh
E=0.5mv2 + 0.5Iω2 + mgh
I = (2/5)M(ro)2
ω=Δθ/Δt

The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried using conservation of energy to say that ƩEo=ƩE
So:

mgh= 0.5mv2 + 0.5Iω2 + mgh

which, when you plug in the moment of inertia for a sphere and the definition of ω:

mgh= 0.5mv2 + 0.5(2/5)M(ro)2)(Δθ/Δt)2 + mgh

These are my main problems:
1) How do I find a value for h? I understand that from the diagram, h is the distance from the end of the ramp to the ground but how I find a value for that?
2) How do I find time (which is needed to calculate ω)?

The final answer is supposed to be √(10/7)g(Ro-ro)

Thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have part of a response ready to send, but as I was working out the problem to make sure I was getting the correct answer, I noticed something odd. When I got the final answer, it did not match with the answer you gave. Are you sure that the answer you posted is correct, or is it possible it is mistaken? I know that certain textbooks are notorious for giving wrong answers (I have one like that). I'm pretty sure that the answer should be[tex]v = \sqrt{\frac{10gR_0}{7}}[/tex]If someone else could verify/refute my answer, that wouldn't be a bad thing. I don't want to continue explaining anything until I know I've got it right.
 
NathanLeduc1 said:
I've tried using conservation of energy to say that ƩEo=ƩE
So:

mgh= 0.5mv2 + 0.5Iω2 + mgh
Good. But distinguish the two different values of h: h1 & h2 perhaps.

which, when you plug in the moment of inertia for a sphere and the definition of ω:

mgh= 0.5mv2 + 0.5(2/5)M(ro)2)(Δθ/Δt)2 + mgh
Hint: Apply the condition for rolling without slipping. That will allow you to express ω in terms of v. (Forget about Δθ/Δt.)

These are my main problems:
1) How do I find a value for h? I understand that from the diagram, h is the distance from the end of the ramp to the ground but how I find a value for that?
I think the diagram is a bit off, so draw your own. Imagine a circular ramp. The initial position is just where the wall is vertical, so a line drawn from the center of the circle to the sphere would be horizontal. Compare the initial and final height of the ball. (Measured from what point?)

2) How do I find time (which is needed to calculate ω)?
You won't need that.

The final answer is supposed to be √(10/7)g(Ro-ro)
That's fine.
 
Okay, if I make the origin of the coordinate plane the center of the circle, then h1 would be 0 and h2 would be Ro-Rocos(45°)

So then:

0=0.5mv2+0.5(0.4Mro2)(v/Ro)+mg(Ro-Rocos45)

-mg(Ro-Rocos45)=0.5mv2+(Mro2v)/5Ro

-mg(Ro-Rocos45)=(5Romv2)/(10Ro)+(2Mro2v)/10Ro

-mg(Ro-Rocos45)=(5Romv2+2Mro2)/10Ro

-mg(Ro-Rocos45)(10Ro) = 5Romv2+2Mro2v

Now what do I do? I can tell that from the answer I shouldn't have an M in the final answer so should that cancel out? Also, should m cancel out?
 
NathanLeduc1 said:
Okay, if I make the origin of the coordinate plane the center of the circle, then h1 would be 0 and h2 would be Ro-Rocos(45°)
Where does the 45° angle come from?

Also: Don't forget the radius of the ball. Measure the height of the ball's center.
 
I got the 45 degree angle from the 135 degree angle. If we make the center of the circle the origin of the plane, then the y component of Ro would be Rocos(45). Right?

Also, why do I need the radius of the ball? I have it as part of the moment of inertia formula for the sphere but, other than that, I'm confused why I need it. Does it have something to do with the potential energy?
 
NathanLeduc1 said:
I got the 45 degree angle from the 135 degree angle. If we make the center of the circle the origin of the plane, then the y component of Ro would be Rocos(45). Right?
That diagram doesn't seem to make sense. Where did you get it? Better to imagine a semicircular track that the ball is rolling down. Note that the starting point is where the wall is vertical, which is not at 135 degrees.

Also, why do I need the radius of the ball? I have it as part of the moment of inertia formula for the sphere but, other than that, I'm confused why I need it. Does it have something to do with the potential energy?
The "trick" is figure how the height of the center of the ball changes as it goes down the track. (Yes, that does affect the potential energy.)
 
Okay, well now I'm absolutely lost. If we assume the initial position of the ball to be 0, then the final height would be Rocos(45) because 135-90=45. We're changing quadrants that the ball is in so now the 135° angle is a 45° angle.

If I'm wrong, then I have absolutely no clue where to go next...
 
I found this image that might help:
we4.gif


Not perfect, but pretty close to what I imagine the problem to be discussing. Note the initial and final positions of the ball.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Oh, okay, that makes a lot more sense. However, I got a final answer of √(10/7)(gro)

I'm thinking that I did something wrong on the left side of the equation.

The original height of the ball at the beginning would be Ro, right?

If that's the case, I end up with gRo-g(Ro-ro).
 
  • #11
More precisely, here's the work I did:

mgRo=0.5mv2+0.2mro2(v/ro)2+mg(Ro-ro)

gRo=0.5v2+0.2ro2(v/ro)2+g(Ro-ro)

gRo-g(Ro-ro)=0.5v2+0.2v2

gRo-g(Ro-ro)=0.7v2

v=√0.7gro
 
  • #12
Sorry, I mean the final answer I got is v=√(10/7)gro not √0.7gro.
 
  • #13
NathanLeduc1 said:
More precisely, here's the work I did:

mgRo=0.5mv2+0.2mro2(v/ro)2+mg(Ro-ro)
The initial height, Ro, measured from the lowest point of the track, is correct. That's the initial height of the ball's center.

The second height, Ro-ro, is not correct. Rethink that.
 
  • #14
Oh, okay. So the second height is ro and I get the right answer... my question is how does that make sense?

If ro is the radius of the ball but the ball is already at the bottom of the ramp, then how could the radius of the ball be part of potential energy? In order to reduce the potential energy, you'd have to reduce the radius of the ball.

I understand how the math works out now but I'm confused as to the theory behind the math.
 
  • #15
NathanLeduc1 said:
Oh, okay. So the second height is ro and I get the right answer... my question is how does that make sense?

If ro is the radius of the ball but the ball is already at the bottom of the ramp, then how could the radius of the ball be part of potential energy? In order to reduce the potential energy, you'd have to reduce the radius of the ball.
What's the height of the center of the ball initially?

What's the height of the center of the ball when it is at the bottom?

What matters to gravitational PE is how the ball's center of mass changes height.
 
  • #16
Ah, I understand now. So it all comes down to what frame of reference we're looking at it from...

Many thanks for the help.
 
  • #17
In this situation we have both linear kinetic energy and the rolling kinetic energy, so:
KR= 0,5.I.ω2 =0,5.2/5.m.r2. (v2/r2) =1/5.m.v2
and Klin=0,5.m.v2
we also have the potential energy: E=m.g.h
with h= R-r (we don't have to forget to subtract the radius of the ball to the ground)
lets use the equation of conservation of energy (because we have no friction):
0,5.m.v2 +1/5.m.v2=m.g.(R-r)
when simplifying this equation we get: v= √10/7.g.(R-r)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
12K
Replies
3
Views
2K