Velocity of Waves in Liquid: Relation with Wavelength, γ & ρ

AI Thread Summary
The velocity of waves in a liquid is influenced by the wavelength (λ), surface tension (γ), and density (ρ) of the liquid. An equation can be derived to relate these variables, noting that surface tension is measured in force per unit length (N.m^-1). By analyzing the fundamental units, it becomes clear that combining λ, γ, and ρ results in units that require adjustment to achieve the desired velocity unit of m.s^-1. To resolve this, one of the variables must be placed in the denominator to cancel out the mass unit. Ultimately, the relationship can be expressed with a square root adjustment to ensure the units align correctly for wave velocity.
ahmedb
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
The velocity of waves in a liquid depends on the wavelength λ, surface tension γ, and density ρ, of the liquid, Derive an equation to relate v, with wavelength, surface tension and density, (note: surface tension, has a formula of force per unlit length and SI unit of Nm^-1)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ahmedb said:
The velocity of waves in a liquid depends on the wavelength λ, surface tension γ, and density ρ, of the liquid, Derive an equation to relate v, with wavelength, surface tension and density, (note: surface tension, has a formula of force per unlit length and SI unit of Nm^-1)

reducing to fundamental units

λ - m
γ - N.m-1 = kg.m.s-2.m-1 = kg.s-2
ρ - kg.m-3

The final answer is velocity, so m.s-1

If you multiply all three together [ie λ x γ x ρ] we have m x kg.s-2 x kg.m-3 = kg2.s-2.m-2

Not quite what we wanted. We needed the kg to cancel out, so one of γ or ρ needed to be in the denominator.

The fact that all units were squared doesn't matter - we can throw in a √ at the end to fix that.

have a play round and see how you get on.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top