Velocity out of the Lorentz factor

Aureum
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
System K:

x=a t=2a/c
x'=2a t'=3a/c

I need to figure out in what frame K' will these events appear to occur at the same time?

I know the answer is c/2 in the -x direction but finding I'm having a hard time finding the velocity.

I really confused on how to get the velocity out from Lorentz factor. That way I can solve for V. It's not just with this problem but often I find myself with an expression equaling velocity times the Lorentz factor.

When I try derive relativistic velocity from the relativistic energy equation

E=(ymvc)+(mc^2)
E=mc(yv+mc)
E/(mc)=yv+mc
(E/(mc))-mc=yv

How do I get the velocity out of the Lorentz factor so from the energy expression I can derive velocity?

E^2=(pc)^2+(mc^2)^2
to
v=pc^2/(√((pc)^2+(mc^2)^2))
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
So in system K you have two events x1=(a,2a/c) and x2=(2a,3a/c)

The difference is (a,a/c) with magnitude sqrt(a^2-c^2*a^2/c^2) = 0, meaning the interval is lightlike.

In a new coordinate system K' the events shall occur at x1'=(0,0) and x2'=(a',0). (I picked the zeroes arbitrarily). The events obviously occur at the same time in that system since both time coordinates are the same. Since the interval must be unchanged regardless of the coordinate change, a'^2 = 0, i.e. a' must be zero.

Thus in the coordinate system K' the events occur at the same place and time. From Ks point of view, K' travels a distance a in a time a/c and is moving at speed c.

Intuitively, this makes sense. Suppose event 1 is a someone turning on a flashlight and event 2 is the light hitting a screen. For someone moving along with the beam of light the events are basically coincident in space and time.

Does that help?

>often I find myself with an expression equaling velocity times the Lorentz factor

If you have yv = v/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) = 1/sqrt(1/v^2 - 1/c^2) then simply compute v = 1/sqrt(1/(yv)^2 + 1/c^2) = cyv/sqrt(c^2 + (yv)^2) to extract the velocity
 
Last edited:
Ya, that helps a lot thanks. I don't know what I was thinking earlier.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
214
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Back
Top