Velocity vector along a parabola

AI Thread Summary
A velocity vector along a parabola maintains the same initial and final velocity due to the constant x-axis velocity and linear y-axis velocity. The discussion centers on understanding this behavior through kinematics, particularly in the context of projectile motion under gravity. The gravitational force acts solely in the negative y direction, influencing the velocity relationships throughout the motion. The explanation is rooted in Newton's second law, which clarifies how these velocity components interact. Understanding these principles helps in proving the velocity relationships in parabolic motion.
matatat
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello, I'm new here and wasn't sure if this should be put into the homework section. It's not a homework question but the nature of the problem is homework-ish in nature I suppose.

Anyway I'm trying to understand why a velocity vector along a parabola would have the same initial velocity as its final velocity. I realize that velocity along the x-axis is a constant and I think the velocity along the y-axis remains linear. Although I can't figure out why both are so. Could someone explain this to me or direct me to where I would find the answer?

thanks
matt
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry also I forgot to mention that it makes sense in the fact that it will have enough velocity to reach a point y and its velocity will be zero and as it returns its velocity will return back to the original but negative. I was more so wondering how I could prove this with kinematics.
 
I assume you're talking about a projectile thrown upwards in a gravitational field, right?

Then the behavior you describe is derived directly from Newton's second law. Namely, the gravitational force only acts in the -y direction. Can you see why this leads to the velocity relationships?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top