Velocity when two object collide in an elastic collision

AI Thread Summary
In an elastic collision between two objects, while conservation of momentum allows for multiple final velocities, conservation of kinetic energy results in a unique outcome. For two 1 kg objects, one moving at 1 m/s and the other stationary, the first object can transfer all its kinetic energy to the second or retain some, but only one specific combination of velocities will satisfy both conservation laws. This unique solution is determined by the principle that the relative velocity before the collision equals the relative velocity after the collision. The discussion emphasizes the importance of both conservation laws in predicting the final velocities. Understanding these principles clarifies the mechanics of elastic collisions.
mahela007
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
When two objects collide in an elastic collision, aren't there an infinite number of possible velocities that the objects can gain? Let's consider two objects each of mass 1kg. One of them is moving at 1 ms-1 and the other is stationary.
After the collision, the first object (the one which was moving) could come to rest and the other object could start moving at 1 ms-1.
That's one scenario in which the 1st object transfers all it's kinetic energy to the other object.

Couldn't the first object keep some of it's energy and only transfer a fraction of it's total KE to the other object? (In which case both objects would be moving after the collision). If that happens, then couldn't there be a several pairs of values for the velocity of Object 1 and object 2 which would comply with the conservation of momentum and the conservation of kinetic energy? How can we determine which one of these combinations of velocities will occur ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi mahela007! :smile:
mahela007 said:
… If that happens, then couldn't there be a several pairs of values for the velocity of Object 1 and object 2 which would comply with the conservation of momentum and the conservation of kinetic energy? How can we determine which one of these combinations of velocities will occur ?

No, conservation of both energy and momentum always gives a unique answer.

Try it and see. :wink:
 
We have been discussing more or less about this in the thread "Acceleration in an elastic collision", which you may want to look at for more detail. Conservation of momentum alone does allow for many final velocities. But, as tiny-tim implied, if you stipulate that the collision is perfectly elastic, that is to say, if all kinetic energy is conserved in the system, then there is only one possible solution. In particular, it's one complying with the requirement that the relative velocity of approach (before collision) = the relative velocity of separation (after collision).
 
Hm... Ok.. I'll check that and post back.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top