MHB Verifying Solutions to Isomorphism Problem: Need Help!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joe20
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Isomorphism
Joe20
Messages
53
Reaction score
1
Hi, I have attached the question and the solutions to part a and b of this question. Would like someone to verify if I have done anything wrong. Greatly appreciate it! Thanks.

Would also like to check if there is a simpler method to prove f is an isomorphism? Thanks
 

Attachments

  • q4.png
    q4.png
    10.4 KB · Views: 112
  • Webp.net-resizeimage.jpg
    Webp.net-resizeimage.jpg
    107.6 KB · Views: 118
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Alexis87,

Your proof for part (a) is somewhat circular — the goal was to prove $[a]_6 = _6$ implies $([a]_2,[a]_3) = (_2, _3)$, but you started with that claim. Remove it.

For part (b), remove the beginning part of your proof. To show that $f$ is bijective, you could show that the images $f(j)$, $j = 0,\ldots, 5$, are distinct, and so $f$ is injective. Since $f$ is an injective mapping between two sets of the same cardinality, it is also surjective. Hence, $f$ is bijective.
 
The world of 2\times 2 complex matrices is very colorful. They form a Banach-algebra, they act on spinors, they contain the quaternions, SU(2), su(2), SL(2,\mathbb C), sl(2,\mathbb C). Furthermore, with the determinant as Euclidean or pseudo-Euclidean norm, isu(2) is a 3-dimensional Euclidean space, \mathbb RI\oplus isu(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (1,3), i\mathbb RI\oplus su(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (3,1), SU(2) is the double cover of SO(3), sl(2,\mathbb C) is the...