MHB Verifying Solutions to Isomorphism Problem: Need Help!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joe20
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Isomorphism
Joe20
Messages
53
Reaction score
1
Hi, I have attached the question and the solutions to part a and b of this question. Would like someone to verify if I have done anything wrong. Greatly appreciate it! Thanks.

Would also like to check if there is a simpler method to prove f is an isomorphism? Thanks
 

Attachments

  • q4.png
    q4.png
    10.4 KB · Views: 110
  • Webp.net-resizeimage.jpg
    Webp.net-resizeimage.jpg
    107.6 KB · Views: 111
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Alexis87,

Your proof for part (a) is somewhat circular — the goal was to prove $[a]_6 = _6$ implies $([a]_2,[a]_3) = (_2, _3)$, but you started with that claim. Remove it.

For part (b), remove the beginning part of your proof. To show that $f$ is bijective, you could show that the images $f(j)$, $j = 0,\ldots, 5$, are distinct, and so $f$ is injective. Since $f$ is an injective mapping between two sets of the same cardinality, it is also surjective. Hence, $f$ is bijective.
 

Thread '##(A/\mathfrak{a})_{\mathfrak{p}/\mathfrak{a}}## and its isomorphism?'

I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
View full post »

Thread 'Questions about non existence of GCDs vs (coimages, cokernels)'

The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
View full post »

Thread 'Decomposition into irreps of compact Lie group'

When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
View full post »

Similar threads

MHB Is G/G isomorphic to the trivial group? A proof for G/G\cong \{e\}
Replies
1
Views
2K
I ##(A/\mathfrak{a})_{\mathfrak{p}/\mathfrak{a}}## and its isomorphism?
Replies
31
Views
1K
MHB Is My Solution to Part B of the Math Question Correct?
Replies
1
Views
1K
MHB Second Isomorphism Theorem for Rings .... Bland Theorem 3.3.15 .... ....
Replies
6
Views
2K
A Isomorphism concepts,( example periods elliptic functions )
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Trouble understanding an online solution to an exercise in Dummit & Foote
Replies
2
Views
575
MHB Third Isomorphism Theorem for Rings .... Bland Theorem 3.3.16 .... ....
Replies
3
Views
2K
MHB Group R^× isomorphic to the group R?
Replies
5
Views
2K
Counterexample to Isomorphic Subfields: Help Needed
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Need clarification on a theorem about field extensions/isomorphisms
Replies
14
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top