MHB Verifying the Equality for n = 2: Is the Equation Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tmt1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation under discussion, $$\frac{2^n}{n!} + 1 = \frac{{2}^{n + 1}}{(n + 1)!}$$, is being verified for various values of n. For n = 1, the left side equals 3 while the right side equals 2, indicating the equation does not hold. Similarly, for n = 2, the left side results in 3, while the right side equals 4/3, further confirming the equation's inconsistency. Graphical analysis suggests that the equation has limited solutions, specifically near but not equal to 1. The discussion emphasizes the need for careful verification of mathematical equations before posting.
tmt1
Messages
230
Reaction score
0
I have this equality

$$\frac{2^n}{n!} + 1 = \frac{{2}^{n + 1}}{n + 1}$$

and I'm not sure if it is correct or how to verify if it is correct. I've tried a few different approaches that have led to dead ends.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
tmt said:
I have this equality

$$\frac{2^n}{n!} + 1 = \frac{{2}^{n + 1}}{n + 1}$$

and I'm not sure if it is correct or how to verify if it is correct. I've tried a few different approaches that have led to dead ends.
n = 1
[math]\frac{2^1}{1!} + 1 = \frac{2}{1} + 1 = 2 + 1 = 3[/math]

[math]\frac{2^{1 + 1}}{1 + 1} = \frac{2^2}{2} = \frac{4}{2} = 2[/math]

So the equation can only have solutions for certain n, not all.

Graphing it we can see that the equation has only two solutions close to, but not equal to 1. See below.

Graph

-Dan
 
tmt said:
I have this equality

$$\frac{2^n}{n!} + 1 = \frac{{2}^{n + 1}}{n + 1}$$

and I'm not sure if it is correct or how to verify if it is correct. I've tried a few different approaches that have led to dead ends.

Sorry, I meant to write

$$\frac{2^n}{n!} + 1 = \frac{{2}^{n + 1}}{(n + 1)!}$$

Does this make more sense? I'm trying a bunch of ways to verify it, but none of it works.
 
tmt said:
Sorry, I meant to write

$$\frac{2^n}{n!} + 1 = \frac{{2}^{n + 1}}{(n + 1)!}$$

Does this make more sense? I'm trying a bunch of ways to verify it, but none of it works.
n = 2

[math]\frac{2^2}{2!} + 1 = \frac{4}{2} + 1 = 2 + 1 = 3[/math]

[math]\frac{2^{2 + 1}}{(2 + 1)!} = \frac{2^3}{3!} = \frac{8}{6} = \frac{4}{3}[/math]

You really need to check these before you post them. (n = 1 doesn't work either. I chose n = 2 for variety.)

-Dan
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top